Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22750949›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2012

Impact of screening test performance and cost on mortality reduction and cost-effectiveness of multimodal ovarian cancer screening.

Charles W Drescher, Sarah Hawley, Jason D Thorpe, Simone Marticke, Martin McIntosh, Sanjiv S Gambhir, Nicole Urban

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Use of CA125 and HE4 serum markers to predict ovarian cancer in elevated-risk women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Normal Risk Ovarian Screening Study: 21-Year Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer: Towards a Cost-Effective Prevention Strategy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biomarkers and Strategies for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Proceedings: Pathways for Successful Translation of New Imaging Agents and Modalities-Phase III Studies.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charles W DrescherDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. cdresche@fhcrc.org
Sarah Hawley
Jason D Thorpe
Simone Marticke
Martin McIntosh
Sanjiv S Gambhir
Nicole Urban
Stanford University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USCancer Research Center · US

Funding

Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Fred Hutchinson Breast Cancer Clinical Validation CenterU01CA152637 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Christopher I Li, Savannah Corrina Partridge · 2010 to 2026
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing ovarian cancer screening trials are investigating the efficacy of a two-step screening strategy using currently available blood and imaging tests [CA125 and transvaginal sonography (TVS)]. Concurrently, efforts to develop new biomarkers and imaging tests seek to improve screening performance beyond its current limits. This study estimates the mortality reduction, years of life saved, and cost-effectiveness achievable by annual multimodal screening using increasing CA125 to select women for TVS, and predicts improvements achievable by replacing currently available screening tests with hypothetical counterparts with better performance characteristics. An existing stochastic microsimulation model is refined and used to screen a virtual cohort of 1 million women from ages 45 to 85 years. Each woman is assigned a detailed disease course and screening results timeline. The preclinical behavior of CA125 and TVS is simulated using empirical data derived from clinical trials. Simulations in which the disease incidence and performance characteristics of the screening tests are independently varied are conducted to evaluate the impact of these factors on overall screening performance and costs. Our results show that when applied to women at average risk, annual screening using increasing CA125 to select women for TVS achieves modest mortality reduction (~13%) and meets currently accepted cost-effectiveness guidelines. Screening outcomes are relatively insensitive to second-line test performance and costs. Identification of a first-line test that does substantially better than CA125 and has similar costs is required for screening to reduce ovarian mortality by at least 25% and be reasonably cost-effective.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ProgressionEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsSurvival RateCA-125 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID22750949
PMCPMC3729263
OpenAlexW2150111492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.