Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22750248›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2012

In vivo effects of L1 coating on inflammation and neuronal health at the electrode-tissue interface in rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion.

C L Kolarcik, D Bourbeau, E Azemi, E Rost, L Zhang, C F Lagenaur, D J Weber, X T Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C L KolarcikDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
D Bourbeau
E Azemi
E Rost
L Zhang
C F Lagenaur
D J Weber
X T Cui
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Improving chronic neural recording performance through biomaterial strategiesR01NS062019 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CUI, XINYAN TRACY · 2008 to 2018
$4.4M
Multichannel Microstimulation of Primary Afferent Neurons to Restore ProprioceptiR01NS072342 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEBER, DOUGLAS J · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062019NINDS NIH HHS R01NS062019NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal cord (SC) and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) are target implantation regions for neural prosthetics, but the tissue-electrode interface in these regions is not well-studied. To improve understanding of these locations, the tissue reactions around implanted electrodes were characterized. L1, an adhesion molecule shown to maintain neuronal density and reduce gliosis in brain tissue, was then evaluated in SC and DRG implants. Following L1 immobilization onto neural electrodes, the bioactivities of the coatings were verified in vitro using neuron, astrocyte and microglia cultures. Non-modified and L1-coated electrodes were implanted into adult rats for 1 or 4 weeks. Hematoxylin and eosin staining along with cell-type specific antibodies were used to characterize the tissue response. In the SC and DRG, cells aggregated at the electrode-tissue interface. Microglia staining was more intense around the implant site and decreased with distance from the interface. Neurofilament staining in both locations decreased or was absent around the implant, compared with surrounding tissue. With L1, neurofilament staining was significantly increased while neuronal cell death decreased. These results indicate that L1-modified electrodes may result in an improved chronic neural interface and will be evaluated in recording and stimulation studies.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedAnimalsAntigens, NuclearCalcium-Binding ProteinsCaspase 3Cell AdhesionCoated Materials, BiocompatibleGanglia, SpinalGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinInflammationMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Neurofilament ProteinsNeuronsRatsAif1 protein, ratAntigens, NuclearCalcium-Binding ProteinsCaspase 3Coated Materials, BiocompatibleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1neurofilament protein HNeurofilament ProteinsRbfox3 protein, ratVimentin

Identifiers

PMID22750248
PMCPMC3429718
OpenAlexW2091267218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.