Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22750193›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2012

Transcutaneous vaccination via laser microporation.

Richard Weiss, Michael Hessenberger, Sophie Kitzmüller, Doris Bach, Esther E Weinberger, Wolf D Krautgartner, Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger, Bernard Malissen, Christof Boehler, Yogeshvar N Kalia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Laser-assisted skin delivery of immunocontraceptive rabies nanoparticulate vaccine in poloxamer gel.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Laser adjuvant for vaccination.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Richard WeissDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Michael Hessenberger
Sophie Kitzmüller
Doris Bach
Esther E Weinberger
Wolf D Krautgartner
Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger
Bernard Malissen
Christof Boehler
Yogeshvar N Kalia
Josef Thalhamer
Sandra Scheiblhofer

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 21125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driven by constantly increasing knowledge about skin immunology, vaccine delivery via the cutaneous route has recently gained renewed interest. Considering its richness in immunocompetent cells, targeting antigens to the skin is considered to be more effective than intramuscular or subcutaneous injections. However, circumvention of the superficial layer of the skin, the stratum corneum, represents the major challenge for cutaneous immunization. An optimal delivery method has to be effective and reliable, but also highly adaptable to specific demands, should avoid the use of hypodermic needles and the requirement of specially trained healthcare workers. The P.L.E.A.S.E. (Precise Laser Epidermal System) device employed in this study for creation of aqueous micropores in the skin fulfills these prerequisites by combining the precision of its laser scanning technology with the flexibility to vary the number, density and the depth of the micropores in a user-friendly manner. We investigated the potential of transcutaneous immunization via laser-generated micropores for induction of specific immune responses and compared the outcomes to conventional subcutaneous injection. By targeting different layers of the skin we were able to bias polarization of T cells, which could be modulated by addition of adjuvants. The P.L.E.A.S.E. device represents a highly effective and versatile platform for transcutaneous vaccination.

Indexed as

LasersAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsAntigensbeta-GalactosidaseCell LineCytokinesDextransDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLAntigensbeta-GalactosidaseCytokinesDextransFluorescein-5-isothiocyanatefluorescein isothiocyanate dextranImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GOvalbumin

Identifiers

PMID22750193
PMCPMC3462999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.