ArticleMolecular phylogenetics and evolution2012
A very short, functionally constrained sequence diagnoses cone snails in several Conasprella clades.
Article in Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails.The Journal of molluscan studies · 2015Article
- Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the cone snails (Gastropoda, Conoidea).Molecular phylogenetics and evolution · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The traditional taxonomy of ca. 700 cone snails assigns all species to a single genus, Conus Linnaeus 1758. However, an increasing body of evidence suggests that some belong to a phylogenetically distinct clade that is sometimes referred to as Conasprella. Previous work (Kraus et al., 2011) showed that a short (259 bp) conserved intronic sequence (CIS) of the γ-glutamyl carboxylase gene (intron 9) can be used to delineate deep phylogenetic relationships among some groups of Conus. The work described here uses intron 9 (338 bp) to resolve problematic relationships among the conasprellans and to distinguish them from Conus proper. Synapomorphic mutations at just 39 sites can resolve several groups within Conasprella because the informative region of intron 9 is so well conserved that the phylogenetic signal is not obscured by homoplasies at conflicting sites. Intron 9 also unambiguously distinguishes Conasprella as a whole from Conus because the conserved regions that are so well conserved within each group are not alignable and clearly not homologous between them. This pattern suggests that expression of the γ-glutamyl carboxylase gene may have undergone a functionally significant change in Conus or Conasprella shortly after they diverged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.