Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22749788›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2012

Current advances and pressing problems in studies of stopping.

Jeffrey D Schall, David C Godlove

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Subthalamic Activity for Motor Execution and Cancelation in Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Common neural processes during action-stopping and infrequent stimulus detection: The frontocentral P3 as an index of generic motor inhibition.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cognitive Control of Saccadic Selection and Inhibition from within the Core Cortical Saccadic Network.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey D SchallDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Center for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. jeffrey.d.schall@vanderbilt.edu
David C Godlove
Vanderbilt Health · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

NEURAL CONTROL OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENTR01MH055806 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SCHALL, JEFFREY D · 1996 to 2016
$5.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH055806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stop-signal task probes agents' ability to inhibit responding. A well-known race model affords estimation of the duration of the inhibition process. This powerful approach has yielded numerous insights into the neural circuitry underlying response control, the specificity of inhibition across effectors and response strategies, and executive processes such as performance monitoring. Translational research between human and non-human primates has been particularly useful in this venture. Continued progress with the stop-signal paradigm is contingent upon appreciating the dynamics of entire cortical and subcortical neural circuits and obtaining neurophysiological data from each node in the circuit. Progress can also be anticipated on extensions of the race model to account for selective stopping; we expect this will entail embedding behavioral inhibition in the broader context of executive control.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainDecision MakingExecutive FunctionHumansNeural InhibitionNeurobiologyPrimatesTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID22749788
PMCPMC3496825
OpenAlexW2034923977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.