A game of kit and mouse: the Kit is still in the bag.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Mast Cells and Skin and Breast Cancers: A Complicated and Microenvironment-Dependent Role.Cells · 2021
   Review
2. Type 2 Inflammatory Responses in Autoimmune Demyelination of the Central Nervous System: Recent Advances.Journal of immunology research · 2019
   Review
3. Mast Cells as Regulators of T Cell Responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2015
   Review
4. Mast cells aggravate sepsis by inhibiting peritoneal macrophage phagocytosis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Cre-mediated cell ablation contests mast cell contribution in models of antibody- and T cell-mediated autoimmunity.2011

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as