Trial reportBMC medical genomics2012
Genomic signatures for predicting survival and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Trial report in BMC medical genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early2 factor (E2F) deregulation is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma.Oncotarget · 2016Trial
- Global microRNA profiling in favorable prognosis subgroups of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) demonstrates no significant expression differences with metastases of matched known primary tumors.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2013Trial
- Multiregional transcriptomic profiling provides improved prognostic insight in localized non-small cell lung cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Identification of protein biomarkers for prediction of response to platinum-based treatment regimens in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Molecular oncology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatment may predict treatment response in further lines in stage III/IV patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- DNA methylation molecular subtypes for prognosis prediction in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Predicting Chemo-Radiotherapy Sensitivity With Concordant Survival Benefit in Non-Small Cell Lung CancerFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Identification and Prognostic Value Exploration of Radiotherapy Sensitivity-Associated Genes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Predictive value of tumor genetic alteration profiling for chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced NSCLC.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- HECTD1 regulates the expression of SNAIL: Implications for epithelial‑mesenchymal transition.International journal of oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Cancer adjuvant chemotherapy prediction model for non-small cell lung cancer.IET systems biology · 2019Article
- Molecular prediction of adjuvant cisplatin efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)-validation in two independent cohorts.PloS one · 2018Article
- Generating a robust prediction model for stage I lung adenocarcinoma recurrence after surgical resection.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Article
- Prognostic and predictive biomarkers post curative intent therapy.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Review
- Molecular definition of a metastatic lung cancer state reveals a targetable CD109-Janus kinase-Stat axis.Nature medicine · 2017Article
- An individualised signature for predicting response with concordant survival benefit for lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.British journal of cancer · 2016Article
- Intron retention is a widespread mechanism of tumor-suppressor inactivation.Nature genetics · 2015Article
- Biomarkers for efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy following complete resection in NSCLC stages I-IIIA.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproved methods are needed for predicting prognosis and the benefit of delivering adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsA novel prognostic algorithm was identified using genomic profiles from 332 stage I-III adenocarcinomas and independently validated on a separate series of 264 patients with stage I-II tumors, compiled from five previous studies. The prognostic algorithm was used to interrogate genomic data from a series of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Those genes associated with outcome in the adjuvant treatment setting, independent to prognosis were used to train an algorithm able to classify a patient as either a responder or non-responder to ACT. The performance of this signature was independently validated on a separate series of genomic profiles from patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of cisplatin/vinorelbine vs. observation alone (JBR.10).
resultsNSCLC patients exhibiting the high-risk, poor-prognosis form of the 160-gene prognosis signature experienced a 2.80-times higher rate of 5-year disease specific death (log rank P < 0.0001) compared to those with the low-risk, good prognosis profile, adjusted for covariates. The prognosis signature was found to especially accurate at identifying early stage patients at risk of disease specific death within 24 months of diagnosis when compared to traditional methods of outcome prediction.Separately, NSCLC patients with the 37-gene ACT-response signature (n = 70, 64 %), benefited significantly from cisplatin/vinorelbine (adjusted HR: 0.23, P = 0.0032). For those patients predicted to be responders, receiving this form of ACT conferred a 25 % improvement in the probability of 5-year-survival, compared to observation alone and adjusted for covariates. Conversely, in those patients predicted to be non-responders, ACT was observed to offer no significant survival benefit (adjusted HR: 0.55, P = 0.32).The two gene signatures overlap by one gene only SPSB3, which interacts with the oncogene MET. In this study, higher levels of SPSB3 which were associated with favorable prognosis and benefit from ACT.
conclusionsThese complimentary prognostic and predictive gene signatures may assist physicians in their management and treatment of patients with early stage lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.