Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22747988›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2012

Transferability of interventions in health education: a review.

Linda Cambon, Laetitia Minary, Valery Ridde, François Alla

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04927455 (Pilot Study to Evaluate Impact and Transferability of an Alcohol Focused Harm Reduction Support System Based on Mental Health Recovery Named IACA!), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04927455 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study to Evaluate Impact and Transferability of an Alcohol Focused Harm Reduction Support System Based on Mental Health Recovery Named IACA!

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2021 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsCraving, Addiction, Alcohol, Alcoholism
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda CambonEA 4360 Apemac, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lorraine, 54250 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. linda.cambon@wanadoo.fr
Laetitia Minary
Valery Ridde
François Alla

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth education interventions are generally complex. Their outcomes result from both the intervention itself and the context for which they are developed. Thus, when an intervention carried out in one context is reproduced in another, its transferability can be questionable. We performed a literature review to analyze the concept of transferability in the health education field.

methodsArticles included were published between 2000 and 2010 that addressed the notion of transferability of interventions in health education. Articles were analyzed using a standardized grid based on four items: 1) terminology used; 2) factors that influenced transferability; 3) capacity of the research and evaluation designs to assess transferability; and 4) tools and criteria available to assess transferability.

results43 articles met the inclusion criteria. Only 13 of them used the exact term "transferability" and one article gave an explicit definition: the extent to which the measured effectiveness of an applicable intervention could be achieved in another setting. Moreover, this concept was neither clearly used nor distinguished from others, such as applicability. We highlight the levels of influence of transferability and their associated factors, as well as the limitations of research methods in their ability to produce transferable conclusions.

conclusionsWe have tried to clarify the concept by defining it along three lines that may constitute areas for future research: factors influencing transferability, research methods to produce transferable data, and development of criteria to assess transferability. We conclude this review with three propositions: 1) a conceptual clarification of transferability, especially with reference to other terms used; 2) avenues for developing knowledge on this concept and analyzing the transferability of interventions; and 3) in relation to research, avenues for developing better evaluation methods for assessing the transferability of interventions.

Indexed as

Health EducationTechnology TransferHumans

Identifiers

PMID22747988
PMCPMC3406958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.