ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2012
Sudden infant death syndrome: a re-examination of temporal trends.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal Risk Factors for Brief Resolved Unexplained Events in Infants.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
- A compelling symmetry: The extended fetuses-at-risk perspective on modal, optimal and relative birthweight and gestational age.PloS one · 2020Article
- Towards a unified perinatal theory: Reconciling the births-based and fetus-at-risk models of perinatal mortality.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2019Article
- The fetuses-at-risk approach: survival analysis from a fetal perspective.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2018Review
- Explaining the recent decrease in US infant mortality rate, 2007-2013.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2017Article
- Incidence and determinants of sudden infant death syndrome: a population-based study on 37 million births.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2015Article
- Similarities and differences in the epidemiology of pyloric stenosis and SIDS.Maternal and child health journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile the reduction in infants' prone sleeping has led to a temporal decline in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), some aspects of this trend remain unexplained. We assessed whether changes in the gestational age distribution of births also contributed to the temporal reduction in SIDS.
methodsSIDS patterns among singleton and twin births in the United States were analysed in 1995-96 and 2004-05. The temporal reduction in SIDS was partitioned using the Kitagawa decomposition method into reductions due to changes in the gestational age distribution and reductions due to changes in gestational age-specific SIDS rates. Both the traditional and the fetuses-at-risk models were used.
resultsSIDS rates declined with increasing gestation under the traditional perinatal model. Rates were higher at early gestation among singletons compared with twins, while the reverse was true at later gestation. Under the fetuses-at-risk model, SIDS rates increased with increasing gestation and twins had higher rates of SIDS than singletons at all gestational ages. Between 1995-96 and 2004-05, SIDS declined from 8.3 to 5.6 per 10,000 live births among singletons and from 14.2 to 10.6 per 10,000 live births among twins. Decomposition using the traditional model showed that the SIDS reduction among singletons and twins was entirely due to changes in the gestational age-specific SIDS rate. The fetuses-at-risk model attributed 45% of the SIDS reduction to changes in the gestational age distribution and 55% of the reduction to changes in gestational age-specific SIDS rates among singletons; among twins these proportions were 64% and 36%, respectively.
conclusionChanges in the gestational age distribution may have contributed to the recent temporal reduction in SIDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.