Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22747904›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2012

Applying the theory of planned behaviour to multiple sclerosis patients' decisions on disease modifying therapy--questionnaire concept and validation.

Jürgen Kasper, Sascha Köpke, Korbinian Fischer, Nina Schäffler, Imke Backhus, Alessandra Solari, Christoph Heesen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04233970 (Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Web-based Programme on Relapse Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis - a Randomized Controlled Trial With Mixed Methods Process Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04233970 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Web-based Programme on Relapse Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis - a Randomized Controlled Trial With Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2020 to 2023Enrolled160ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsweb-based intervention programme, web-based information material offered via the same platform (broca®) in addition to usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Validity and Reliability of the Newly Developed Malay-Language Health Belief of Bloating (HB-Bloat) Scale.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jürgen KasperInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Clinical MS-Research-inims and Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany. k@sper.info
Sascha Köpke
Korbinian Fischer
Nina Schäffler
Imke Backhus
Alessandra Solari
Christoph Heesen
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients making important medical decisions need to evaluate complex information in the light of their own beliefs, attitudes and priorities. The process can be considered in terms of the theory of planned behaviour. Decision support technologies aim at helping patients making informed treatment choices. Instruments assessing informed choices need to include risk knowledge, attitude (towards therapy) and actual uptake. However, mechanisms by which decision support achieves its goals are poorly understood.Our aim was therefore to develop and validate an instrument modeling the process of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients' decision making about whether to undergo disease modifying (immuno-)therapies (DMT).

methodsWe constructed a 30-item patient administered questionnaire to access the elaboration of decisions about DMT in MS according to the theory of planned behaviour. MS-patients' belief composites regarding immunotherapy were classified according to the domains "attitude", "subjective social norm" and "control beliefs" and within each domain to either "expectations" or "values" yielding 6 sub-domains. A randomized controlled trial (n = 192) evaluating an evidence based educational intervention tested the instrument's predictive power regarding intention to use immunotherapy and its sensitivity to the intervention.

resultsThe psychometric properties of the questionnaire were satisfactory (mean item difficulty 62, mean SD 0.9, range 0-3). Responses explain up to 68% of the variability in the intention to use DMT was explained by up to 68% in the total sample. Four weeks after an educational intervention, predictive power was higher in the intervention (IG) compared to the control group (CG) (intention estimate: CG 56% / IG 69%, p = .179; three domains CG 56% / IG 74%, p = .047; six sub-domains CG 64% / IG 78%, p = .073). The IG held more critical beliefs towards immunotherapy (p = .002) and were less willing to comply with social norm (p = .012).

conclusionsThe questionnaire seems to provide a valid way of explaining patients' inherent decision processes and to be sensitive towards varying levels of elaboration. Similar tools based on the theory of planned behaviour could be applied to other decision making scenarios.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisPatient ParticipationPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID22747904
PMCPMC3416666
OpenAlexW2161731186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.