Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22747748›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2012

Considerations in the development of circulating tumor cell technology for clinical use.

David R Parkinson, Nicholas Dracopoli, Brenda Gumbs Petty, Carolyn Compton, Massimo Cristofanilli, Albert Deisseroth, Daniel F Hayes, Gordon Kapke, Prasanna Kumar, Jerry Sh Lee and 12 more

Abstract readReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Circulating tumor cell biomarker panel as an individual-level surrogate for survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

David R ParkinsonNew Enterprise Associates, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. dparkinson@nea.com
Nicholas Dracopoli
Brenda Gumbs Petty
Carolyn Compton
Massimo Cristofanilli
Albert Deisseroth
Daniel F Hayes
Gordon Kapke
Prasanna Kumar
Jerry Sh Lee
Minetta C Liu
Robert McCormack
Stanislaw Mikulski
Larry Nagahara
Klaus Pantel
Sonia Pearson-White
Elizabeth A Punnoose
Lori T Roadcap
Andrew E Schade
Howard I Scher
Caroline C Sigman
Gary J Kelloff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript summarizes current thinking on the value and promise of evolving circulating tumor cell (CTC) technologies for cancer patient diagnosis, prognosis, and response to therapy, as well as accelerating oncologic drug development. Moving forward requires the application of the classic steps in biomarker development-analytical and clinical validation and clinical qualification for specific contexts of use. To that end, this review describes methods for interactive comparisons of proprietary new technologies, clinical trial designs, a clinical validation qualification strategy, and an approach for effectively carrying out this work through a public-private partnership that includes test developers, drug developers, clinical trialists, the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the US National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorHumansBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22747748
PMCPMC3478228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.