Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22747501›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

PePPER: a webserver for prediction of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons.

Anne de Jong, Hilco Pietersma, Martijn Cordes, Oscar P Kuipers, Jan Kok

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The TolC and Lipopolysaccharide-SpecificPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. FromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. TheInfection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  10. Characterization of four novel bacteriophages targeting multi-drug resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Classification of Promoter Sequences from Human Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. SFPQ and Its Isoform as Potential Biomarker for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Computational prediction of promotors inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Computational identification of promoters inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Tuning of Gene Expression inACS synthetic biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne de JongDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Groningen, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hilco Pietersma
Martijn Cordes
Oscar P Kuipers
Jan Kok
Cancer Genomics Centre · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLTiFN · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of DNA motifs that are targets of RNA polymerases, sigma factors and transcription factors (TFs) in prokaryotes is a difficult mission mainly due to as yet undiscovered features in DNA sequences or structures in promoter regions. Improved prediction and comparison algorithms are currently available for identifying transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) and their accompanying TFs and regulon members.

resultsWe here extend the current databases of TFs, TFBSs and regulons with our knowledge on Lactococcus lactis and developed a webserver for prediction, mining and visualization of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons via a novel concept. This new approach includes an all-in-one method of data mining for TFs, TFBSs, promoters, and regulons for any bacterial genome via a user-friendly webserver. We demonstrate the power of this method by mining WalRK regulons in Lactococci and Streptococci and, vice versa, use L. lactis regulon data (CodY) to mine closely related species.

conclusionsThe PePPER webserver offers, besides the all-in-one analysis method, a toolbox for mining for regulons, promoters and TFBSs and accommodates a new L. lactis regulon database in addition to already existing regulon data. Identification of putative regulons and full annotation of intergenic regions in any bacterial genome on the basis of existing knowledge on a related organism can now be performed by biologists and it can be done for a wide range of regulons. On the basis of the PePPER output, biologist can design experiments to further verify the existence and extent of the proposed regulons. The PePPER webserver is freely accessible at http://pepper.molgenrug.nl.

Indexed as

InternetAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticLactococcus lactisPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulonSoftwareStreptococcusTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22747501
PMCPMC3472324
OpenAlexW2112264024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.