ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2012
High priority research needs for gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Pooled it
- A core outcome set for studies of gestational diabetes mellitus prevention and treatment.Diabetologia · 2020Pooled it
- Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015 · on this mapPooled it
- Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial.BMJ open · 2018Trial
- Diabetes Research Matters: A Three-Round Priority-Setting Survey Consultation with Adults Living with Diabetes and Family Members in Australia.The patient · 2024Article
- Protocol for the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Review
- Clinical consequences of gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal obesity as defined by asian BMI thresholds in Viet Nam: a prospective, hospital-based, cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- The top 10 research priorities in diabetes and pregnancy according to women, support networks and healthcare professionals.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2021Article
- The Core Outcome DEvelopment for Carrier Screening (CODECS) study: protocol for development of a core outcome set.Trials · 2021Article
- Indian Research in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus during the Past Three Decades: A Scientometric Analysis.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021Article
- Gestational diabetes prevention and treatment: a protocol for developing core outcome sets.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Article
- Does funded research reflect the priorities of people living with type 1 diabetes? A secondary analysis of research questions.BMJ open · 2017Article
- The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.Trials · 2017Review
- A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets.PloS one · 2017Review
- Low rates of postpartum glucose screening among indigenous and non-indigenous women in Australia with gestational diabetes.Maternal and child health journal · 2015Article
- Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2013Review
- Postpartum care for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across urban, rural and remote locations: a protocol for a cohort linkage study.SpringerPlus · 2013Article
- Prioritizing the Psychosocial Support Needs of Mothers with Gestational Diabetes: A Delphi Study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIdentification of unanswered research questions about the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is necessary to focus future research endeavors. We developed a process for elucidating the highest priority research questions on GDM.
methodsUsing a systematic review on GDM as a starting point, we developed an eight-step process: (1) identification of research gaps, (2) feedback from the review's authors, (3) translation of gaps into researchable questions using population, intervention, comparators, outcomes, setting (PICOS) framework, (4) local institutions' stakeholders' refinement of research questions, (5) national stakeholders' use of Delphi method to develop consensus on the importance of research questions, (6) prioritization of outcomes, (7) conceptual framework, and (8) evaluation.
resultsWe identified 15 high priority research questions for GDM. The research questions focused on medication management of GDM (e.g., various oral agents vs. insulin), delivery management for women with GDM (e.g., induction vs. expectant management), and identification of risk factors for, prevention of, and screening for type 2 diabetes in women with prior GDM. Stakeholders rated the development of chronic diseases in offspring, cesarean delivery, and birth trauma as high priority outcomes to measure in future studies.
conclusionsWe developed an eight-step process using a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders to identify 15 research questions of high clinical importance. Researchers, policymakers, and funders can use this list to direct research efforts and resources to the highest priority areas to improve care for women with GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.