Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22747188›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2012

Slow unfolded-state structuring in Acyl-CoA binding protein folding revealed by simulation and experiment.

Vincent A Voelz, Marcus Jäger, Shuhuai Yao, Yujie Chen, Li Zhu, Steven A Waldauer, Gregory R Bowman, Mark Friedrichs, Olgica Bakajin, Lisa J Lapidus and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selective control of ligand binding through a distal mutation that alters the protein native ensemble.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Independent Markov decomposition: Toward modeling kinetics of biomolecular complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Protein storytelling through physics.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Enhanced Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Commonly used FRET fluorophores promote collapse of an otherwise disordered protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Vincent A VoelzDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5080, United States.
Marcus Jäger
Shuhuai Yao
Yujie Chen
Li Zhu
Steven A Waldauer
Gregory R Bowman
Mark Friedrichs
Olgica Bakajin
Lisa J Lapidus
Shimon Weiss
Vijay S Pande
Michigan State University · USStanford University · USCalifornia NanoSystems Institute · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Topology, nucleation, and the protein folding barrierR01GM062868 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PANDE, VIJAY S · 2002 to 2018
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062868NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM062868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein folding is a fundamental process in biology, key to understanding many human diseases. Experimentally, proteins often appear to fold via simple two- or three-state mechanisms involving mainly native-state interactions, yet recent network models built from atomistic simulations of small proteins suggest the existence of many possible metastable states and folding pathways. We reconcile these two pictures in a combined experimental and simulation study of acyl-coenzyme A binding protein (ACBP), a two-state folder (folding time ~10 ms) exhibiting residual unfolded-state structure, and a putative early folding intermediate. Using single-molecule FRET in conjunction with side-chain mutagenesis, we first demonstrate that the denatured state of ACBP at near-zero denaturant is unusually compact and enriched in long-range structure that can be perturbed by discrete hydrophobic core mutations. We then employ ultrafast laminar-flow mixing experiments to study the folding kinetics of ACBP on the microsecond time scale. These studies, along with Trp-Cys quenching measurements of unfolded-state dynamics, suggest that unfolded-state structure forms on a surprisingly slow (~100 μs) time scale, and that sequence mutations strikingly perturb both time-resolved and equilibrium smFRET measurements in a similar way. A Markov state model (MSM) of the ACBP folding reaction, constructed from over 30 ms of molecular dynamics trajectory data, predicts a complex network of metastable stables, residual unfolded-state structure, and kinetics consistent with experiment but no well-defined intermediate preceding the main folding barrier. Taken together, these experimental and simulation results suggest that the previously characterized fast kinetic phase is not due to formation of a barrier-limited intermediate but rather to a more heterogeneous and slow acquisition of unfolded-state structure.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAnimalsCattleDiazepam Binding InhibitorFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMarkov ChainsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein StabilityProtein UnfoldingDiazepam Binding Inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID22747188
PMCPMC3462454
OpenAlexW2129285395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.