Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22745534›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2012

Proposing a standardized method for evaluating patient report of the intensity of dyspnea during exercise testing in COPD.

Asha Hareendran, Nancy K Leidy, Brigitta U Monz, Randall Winnette, Karin Becker, Donald A Mahler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03458182 (Recalled Exertional Breathlessness and Improved Predicted Exercise Capacity), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03458182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Recalled Exertional Breathlessness and Improved Predicted Exercise Capacity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMagnus EkströmRan2018 to 2018Enrolled92ConditionsDyspnea, BreathlessnessArmsAdded exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effects of Dronabinol on Dyspnea and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Concurrent Force Feedback on Load Symmetry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023
    Article
  13. Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation programme including either OCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Determinants of change in physical activity during moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Asha HareendranUnited BioSource Corporation, London, UK. asha.hareendran@unitedbiosource.com
Nancy K Leidy
Brigitta U Monz
Randall Winnette
Karin Becker
Donald A Mahler
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEUnited BioSource Corporation (United Kingdom) · GBDartmouth College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring dyspnea intensity associated with exercise provides insights into dyspnea-limited exercise capacity, and has been used to evaluate treatment outcomes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Three patient-reported outcome scales commonly cited for rating dyspnea during exercise are the modified Borg scale (MBS), numerical rating scale for dyspnea (NRS-D), and visual analogue scale for dyspnea (VAS-D). Various versions of each scale were found. Our objective was to evaluate the content validity of scales commonly used in COPD studies, to explore their ability to capture patients' experiences of dyspnea during exercise, and to evaluate a standardized version of the MBS.

methodsA two-stage procedure was used, with each stage involving one-on-one interviews with COPD patients who had recently completed a clinic-based exercise event on a treadmill or cycle ergometer. An open-ended elicitation interview technique was used to understand patients' experiences of exercise-induced dyspnea, followed by patients completing the three scales. The cognitive interviewing component of the study involved specific questions to evaluate the patients' perspectives of the content and format of the scales. Results from Stage 1 were used to develop a standardized version of the MBS, which was then subjected to further content validity assessment during Stage 2.

resultsThirteen patients participated in the two-stage process (n = 6; n = 7). Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) percent predicted was 40%, mean age 57 years, and 54% were male. Participants used a variety of terms to describe the intensity and variability of exercise-induced dyspnea. Subjects understood the instructions and format of the standardized MBS, and were able to easily select a response to report the level of dyspnea associated with their recent standardized exercise.

conclusionThis study provides initial evidence in support of using a standardized version of the MBS version for quantifying dyspnea intensity associated with exercise in patients with COPD.

Indexed as

Exercise TestSelf ReportCognitionDyspneaFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient PreferencePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveBorg scaleCOPDdyspnea assessmentexercise testing

Identifiers

PMID22745534
PMCPMC3379870
OpenAlexW1795671173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.