ArticleAIP conference proceedings2011
Deviations from Scaling Symmetry in the Apical Half of the Human Cochlea.
Article in AIP conference proceedings, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visualizing motions within the cochlea's organ of Corti and illuminating cochlear mechanics with optical coherence tomography.Hearing research · 2025Review
- A cochlea with three parts? Evidence from otoacoustic emission phase in humans.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017Article
- Distortion-product otoacoustic emission reflection-component delays and cochlear tuning: estimates from across the human lifespan.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Invariant distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) phase elucidates scaling symmetry in the cochlea. Below some low-frequency boundary, DPOAE phase slope steepens. The origin of this break in phase invariance is not clear. Stimulus frequency (SF)OAE delays computed from the slope of phase also manifest discontinuities at low frequencies, though the relationship between the breaking of cochlear scaling as defined by SFOAE and DPOAE metrics has not been examined. In this study, OAEs were recorded in normal-hearing human adults to probe cochlear scaling and its breaking and to examine the correspondence between two OAE metrics of scaling. Results indicate: (1) the apical break in DPOAE phase invariance cannot be explained by contributions from the reflection-source component; (2) DPOAE phase signals a break from scaling near 1.5 kHz and (3) DPOAE and SFOAE metrics of cochlear scaling produce phase discontinuities within approximately one-quarter octave of each other and show comparable rates of breaking, suggesting a common underlying origin.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.