Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22745190›Full record

ReviewMolecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)2012

Minireview: The androgen receptor in breast tissues: growth inhibitor, tumor suppressor, oncogene?

T E Hickey, J L L Robinson, J S Carroll, W D Tilley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Differences in the transcriptional response to fulvestrant and estrogen deprivation in ER-positive breast cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T E HickeyDame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Hanson Institute and University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia.
J L L Robinson
J S Carroll
W D Tilley
Cancer Research UK · GBHanson Institute · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling exerts an antiestrogenic, growth-inhibitory influence in normal breast tissue, and this role may be sustained in estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive luminal breast cancers. Conversely, AR signaling may promote growth of a subset of ERα-negative, AR-positive breast cancers with a molecular apocrine phenotype. Understanding the molecular mechanisms whereby androgens can elicit distinct gene expression programs and opposing proliferative responses in these two breast cancer phenotypes is critical to the development of new therapeutic strategies to target the AR in breast cancer.

Indexed as

AndrogensAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGenes, Tumor SuppressorGrowth InhibitorsHumansMammary Glands, HumanOncogenesReceptors, AndrogenSignal TransductionAndrogensEstrogen Receptor alphaGrowth InhibitorsReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID22745190
PMCPMC3404296
OpenAlexW1974738527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.