Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22744713›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2012

Specific detection of Echinococcus spp. from the Tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata) and the red fox (V. vulpes) using copro-DNA PCR analysis.

Weibin Jiang, Nan Liu, Gaotian Zhang, Pengcuo Renqing, Fei Xie, Tiaoying Li, Zhenghuan Wang, Xiaoming Wang

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Review
  10. Molecular detection ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Morphological and molecular analyses ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  13. Prevalence of Echinococcus Species in Wild Foxes and Stray Dogs in Qinghai Province, China.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  14. Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Taeniid cestodes in Tibetan foxes (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  17. A One Health systematic review of diagnostic tools forFood and waterborne parasitology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weibin JiangSchool of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, No. 3663 North Zhongshan road, Shanghai 200062, People's Republic of China.
Nan Liu
Gaotian Zhang
Pengcuo Renqing
Fei Xie
Tiaoying Li
Zhenghuan Wang
Xiaoming Wang
East China Normal University · CNSichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShanghai Science and Technology Museum · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are three Echinococcus species, Echinococcus granulosus, E. multilocularis, and E. shiquicus, which are distributed on the vast area of pastureland on the eastern Tibetan plateau in China. Tibetan foxes (Vulpes ferrilata) have been determined to be the main wild definitive host of E. multilocularis and E. shiquicus, but little information is available on the prevalence of these two parasites in Tibetan foxes. Consequently, the copro-prevalence of these parasites in foxes from the eastern Tibetan plateau was evaluated in this study. For each copro-DNA sample extracted from fox feces, a 133-bp segment of EgG1 Hae III was used to screen for infection with E. granulosus. Multiplex nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was used to target an 874-bp segment of the mitochondrial COI gene to distinguish E. multilocularis and E. shiquicus. Among 184 fecal samples, 120 were from Tibetan foxes and six from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Of the fecal samples from Tibetan foxes, 74 (giving a copro-prevalence of 62%) showed the presence of Echinococcus spp.: 23 (19%) were found to contain E. multilocularis, 32 (27%) E. shiquicus, and 19 (16%) showed mixed infection with both E. multilocularis and E. shiquicus. Two fecal samples from red foxes were found to be infected with E. multilocularis. No fox feces were found to be infected with E. granulosus. Tests on zinc finger protein genes and a 105-bp fragment of the Sry gene found no significant difference in the prevalence of the two parasites between sexes. The efficiency of our multiplex nested PCR methods were compared with previous polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methods and some problems associated with the copro-PCR were discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, HelminthEchinococcosisEchinococcusFecesFemaleFoxesMaleMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionParasitologyPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceTibetDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID22744713
OpenAlexW2086868980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.