Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22743980›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2012

Analytical tools for characterizing biopharmaceuticals and the implications for biosimilars.

Steven A Berkowitz, John R Engen, Jeffrey R Mazzeo, Graham B Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed, 521 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Methyl Proton Spin Relaxation (Analytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heptad insertion extends theBiodesign research · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven A BerkowitzAnalytical Development, Biogen Idec, 14 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
John R Engen
Jeffrey R Mazzeo
Graham B Jones
Northeastern University · USWaters (United States) · US

Funding

Cancer Immunotherapy by Targeting A2 Adenosine ReceptorR01CA111985 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SITKOVSKY, MICHAIL · 2006 to 2016
$2.7M
Protein conformational change upon membrane associationR01GM086507 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ENGEN, JOHN R · 2009 to 2012
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111985NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111985‑04NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086507NIGMS NIH HHS R01‑GM086507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologics such as monoclonal antibodies are much more complex than small-molecule drugs, which raises challenging questions for the development and regulatory evaluation of follow-on versions of such biopharmaceutical products (also known as biosimilars) and their clinical use once patent protection for the pioneering biologic has expired. With the recent introduction of regulatory pathways for follow-on versions of complex biologics, the role of analytical technologies in comparing biosimilars with the corresponding reference product is attracting substantial interest in establishing the development requirements for biosimilars. Here, we discuss the current state of the art in analytical technologies to assess three characteristics of protein biopharmaceuticals that regulatory authorities have identified as being important in development strategies for biosimilars: post-translational modifications, three-dimensional structures and protein aggregation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalHumansPeptidesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSignal TransductionBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID22743980
PMCPMC3714370
OpenAlexW1971014721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.