Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22743668›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2013

Case-finding options for COPD: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study.

Anamika Jithoo, Paul L Enright, Peter Burney, A Sonia Buist, Eric D Bateman, Wan C Tan, Michael Studnicka, Filip Mejza, Suzanne Gillespie, William M Vollmer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03355677 (A Clinical Interventional Study Into Airways Disease Case Finding and Complex Case Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03355677 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Interventional Study Into Airways Disease Case Finding and Complex Case Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2017 to 2019Enrolled327ConditionsCOPD, AsthmaArmsCase finding Clinic, At Risk Case Clinics, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. The Use of Lung Cancer Screening to Increase Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Diagnosis in Veterans Affairs Primary Care.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. GPs should not try to detect mild COPD.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing Airflow Limitation among Smokers in a Primary Care Setting.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2018
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anamika JithooNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul L Enright
Peter Burney
A Sonia Buist
Eric D Bateman
Wan C Tan
Michael Studnicka
Filip Mejza
Suzanne Gillespie
William M Vollmer
BOLD Collaborative Research Group

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) case finding using data from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Population-based samples of adults aged ≥40 yrs (n = 9,390) from 14 countries completed a questionnaire and spirometry. We compared the screening efficiency of differently staged algorithms that used questionnaire data and/or peak expiratory flow (PEF) data to identify persons at risk for COPD and, hence, needing confirmatory spirometry. Separate algorithms were fitted for moderate/severe COPD and for severe COPD. We estimated the cost of each algorithm in 1,000 people. For moderate/severe COPD, use of questionnaire data alone permitted high sensitivity (97%) but required confirmatory spirometry in 80% of participants. Use of PEF necessitated confirmatory spirometry in only 19-22% of subjects, with 83-84% sensitivity. For severe COPD, use of PEF achieved 91-93% sensitivity, requiring confirmatory spirometry in <9% of participants. Cost analysis suggested that a staged screening algorithm using only PEF initially, followed by confirmatory spirometry as needed, was the most cost-effective case-finding strategy. Our results support the use of PEF as a simple, cost-effective initial screening tool for conducting COPD case-finding in adults aged ≥40 yrs. These findings should be validated in real-world settings such as the primary care environment.

Indexed as

Peak Expiratory Flow RateAdultAgedAlgorithmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonary MedicineRespiratory Function TestsSensitivity and SpecificitySpirometry

Identifiers

PMID22743668
PMCPMC3529919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.