Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22741918›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2012

Red blood cell volume and the capacity for exercise at moderate to high altitude.

Robert A Jacobs, Carsten Lundby, Paul Robach, Max Gassmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert A JacobsInstitute of Veterinary Physiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carsten Lundby
Paul Robach
Max Gassmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxia-stimulated erythropoiesis, such as that observed when red blood cell volume (RCV) increases in response to high-altitude exposure, is well understood while the physiological importance is not. Maximal exercise tests are often performed in hypoxic conditions following some form of RCV manipulation in an attempt to elucidate oxygen transport limitations at moderate to high altitudes. Such attempts, however, have not made clear the extent to which RCV is of benefit to exercise at such elevations. Changes in RCV at sea level clearly have a direct influence on maximal exercise capacity. Nonetheless, at elevations above 3000 m, the evidence is not that clear. Certain studies demonstrate either a direct benefit or decrement to exercise capacity in response to an increase or decrease, respectively, in RCV whereas other studies report negligible effects of RCV manipulation on exercise capacity. Adding to the uncertainty regarding the importance of RCV at high altitude is the observation that Andean and Tibetan high-altitude natives exhibit similar exercise capacities at high altitude (3900 m) even though Andean natives often present with a higher percent haematocrit (Hct) when compared with both lowland natives and Tibetans. The current review summarizes past literature that has examined the effect of RCV changes on maximal exercise capacity at moderate to high altitudes, and discusses the explanation elucidating these seemingly paradoxical observations.

Indexed as

AltitudeAcclimatizationErythrocyte VolumeErythropoiesisExercise ToleranceHumansHypoxiaOxygen Consumption

Identifiers

PMID22741918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.