ReviewGenome medicine2012
Challenges to the clinical application of pluripotent stem cells: towards genomic and functional stability.
Review in Genome medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunomodulatory efficacy of culture condition-dependent modulation of mesenchymal stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Safety and Engraftment of Aligned Cardiac Patches Loaded with hiPSC-CMs in a Large Animal Model of Myocardial Infarction.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Addressing the challenges of immunogenicity, heterogeneity and tumorigenicity in the clinical translation of human embryonic stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- The regenerative journey: exploring stem cell roles from injury detection to tissue repair.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Neural crest-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Fates and perspectives.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Airway epithelial stem cell renewal and differentiation: overcoming challenging steps towards clinical-grade tissue engineering.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Stem Cell Therapy for Diseases of Livestock Animals: An In-Depth Review.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Genes as Genome Stabilizers in Pluripotent Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- FAK signaling suppression by OCT4-ITGA6 mediates the effectively removal of residual pluripotent stem cells and enhances application safety.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Exploiting urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for advancing precision medicine in cell therapy, disease modeling, and drug testing.Journal of biomedical science · 2024Review
- Advances in Genetic Reprogramming: Prospects from Developmental Biology to Regenerative Medicine.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- New treatment methods for myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- BNIP3-dependent mitophagy safeguards ESC genomic integrity via preventing oxidative stress-induced DNA damage and protecting homologous recombination.Cell death & disease · 2022Article
- A Brief Overview of Global Trends in MSC-Based Cell Therapy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Human Peripheral Nerve-Derived Pluripotent Cells Can Be Stimulated by In Vitro Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Pluripotent-Stem-Cell-Derived Hepatic Cells: Hepatocytes and Organoids for Liver Therapy and Regeneration.Cells · 2020Review
- Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2020Article
- Phosphoinositide 3 Kinase Signaling in Human Stem Cells from Reprogramming to Differentiation: A Tale in Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Compartments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Amniotic fluid cells: current progress and emerging challenges in renal regeneration.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2018Review
- DNA repair mechanisms in embryonic stem cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can undergo unlimited self-renewal and are pluripotent, retaining the ability to differentiate into all cell types in the body. As a renewable source of various types of human cells, hESCs hold great therapeutic potential. Although significant advances have been achieved in defining the conditions needed to differentiate hESCs into various types of biologically active cells, many challenges remain in the clinical development of hESC-based cell therapy, such as the immune rejection of allogeneic hESC-derived cells by recipients. Breakthroughs in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which are reprogrammed from somatic cells with defined factors, raise the hope that autologous cells derived from patient-specific iPSCs can be transplanted without immune rejection. However, recent genomic studies have revealed epigenetic and genetic abnormalities associated with induced pluripotency, a risk of teratomas, and immunogenicity of some iPSC derivatives. These findings have raised safety concerns for iPSC-based therapy. Here, we review recent advances in understanding the genomic and functional stability of human pluripotent stem cells, current challenges to their clinical application and the progress that has been made to overcome these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.