ArticleClinical endoscopy2012
Korean guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colonic Polyp Study: Differences in Adenoma Characteristics Based on Colonoscopy History over 5-Year Follow-Up Period.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in a national fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Colon Polyp Detection in Primary Health Care Institutions of Korea: Detection Rate and Issues with Following the Guidelines.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2021Article
- Adherence to Surveillance Guidelines after the Removal of Colorectal Polyps: A Multinational, Multicenter, Prospective Survey.Gut and liver · 2021Article
- Colorectal Polyp Prevalence According to Alcohol Consumption, Smoking and Obesity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Colorectal sessile serrated lesion with large size or synchronous neoplasm: a prospective study.European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020Article
- Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years.Journal of Korean medical science · 2019Article
- Adherence to surveillance guidelines following colonic polypectomy is abysmal.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea.Intestinal research · 2019Article
- Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey.Gut and liver · 2018Article
- Clinical outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors associated with piecemeal resection.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Advanced Colonic Neoplasia at Follow-up Colonoscopy According to Risk Components and Adenoma Location at Index Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study of 1,974 Asymptomatic Koreans.Gut and liver · 2017Article
- The Serrated Polyp Pathway: Is It Time to Alter Surveillance Guidelines?Current gastroenterology reports · 2017Review
- Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study.Journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?Intestinal research · 2017Article
- Unusual Local Recurrence with Distant Metastasis after Successful Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Mucosal Cancer.Clinical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Long-Term Outcome and Surveillance Colonoscopy after Successful Endoscopic Treatment of Large Sessile Colorectal Polyps.Yonsei medical journal · 2016Article
- Distribution of the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate according to age: is recommending colonoscopy screening for koreans over the age of 50 safe?Annals of coloproctology · 2015Article
- Probability of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence based on the results of two previous colonoscopies.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2015Article
- Only the size of resected polyps is an independent risk factor for delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: a 10-year single-center case-control study.Annals of coloproctology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpolypectomy surveillance has become a major indication for colonoscopy as a result of increased use of screening colonoscopy in Korea. In this report, a careful analytic approach was used to address all available evidences to delineate the predictors for advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy and we elucidated the high risk findings of the index colonoscopy as follows: 3 or more adenomas, any adenoma larger than 10 mm, any tubulovillous or villous adenoma, any adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and any serrated polyps larger than 10 mm. Surveillance colonoscopy should be performed five years after the index colonoscopy for those without any high-risk findings and three years after the index colonoscopy for those with one or more high risk findings. However, the surveillance interval can be shortened considering the quality of the index colonoscopy, the completeness of polypectomy, the patient's general condition, and family and medical history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.