Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22741100›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2012

Does cerebral lateralization develop? A study using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound assessing lateralization for language production and visuospatial memory.

Margriet A Groen, Andrew J O Whitehouse, Nicholas A Badcock, Dorothy V M Bishop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Language laterality and cognitive skills: does anatomy matter?Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Reduced Hand Specialization and Idiosyncratic Visuomotor Strategies in Autism During Naturalistic Object Manipulation.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of Lateralization of Language on Cognition Among Left-Handers.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional Connectivity of the Developing Mouse Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  15. The interactive functional biases of manual, language and attention systems.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022
    Article
  16. Plasticity of the language system in children and adults.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mirrored brain organization: Statistical anomaly or reversal of hemispheric functional segregation bias?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Margriet A Groen
Andrew J O Whitehouse
Nicholas A Badcock
Dorothy V M Bishop
University of Oxford · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 082498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the majority of people, language production is lateralized to the left cerebral hemisphere and visuospatial skills to the right. However, questions remain as to when, how, and why humans arrive at this division of labor. In this study, we assessed cerebral lateralization for language production and for visuospatial memory using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound in a group of 60 typically developing children between the ages of six and 16 years. The typical pattern of left-lateralized activation for language production and right-lateralized activation for visuospatial memory was found in the majority of the children (58%). No age-related change in direction or strength of lateralization was found for language production. In contrast, the strength of lateralization (independent of direction) for visuospatial memory function continued to increase with age. In addition, boys showed a trend for stronger right-hemisphere lateralization for visuospatial memory than girls, but there was no gender effect on language laterality. We tested whether having language and visuospatial functions in the same hemisphere was associated with poor cognitive performance and found no evidence for this "functional crowding" hypothesis. We did, however, find that children with left-lateralized language production had higher vocabulary and nonword reading age-adjusted standard scores than other children, regardless of the laterality of visuospatial memory. Thus, a link between language function and left-hemisphere lateralization exists, and cannot be explained in terms of maturational change.

Indexed as

Cerebral lateralizationdevelopmentfunctional transcranial Doppler ultrasonographylanguage productionleft hemisphereright hemispherevisuospatial memory

Identifiers

PMID22741100
PMCPMC3381631
OpenAlexW2123753605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.