ArticleOncology letters2012
Phase II trial of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between Overall Survival and Response or Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2016Article
- Regulation and novel action of thymidine phosphorylase in non-small cell lung cancer: crosstalk with Nrf2 and HO-1.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Docetaxel alone has been confirmed to be beneficial to patients with advanced previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the duration and survival time is short. The study of two-agent combination regimens has important clinical significance. We conducted this randomized controlled phase II trial to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and side effects of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with NSCLC. Patients with previously treated NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy were randomized into two groups; one received capecitabine combined with docetaxel (XT group) and the other received docetaxel alone (T group). Patients in the XT group received chemotherapy as follows: capecitabine 625 mg/m(2), p.o. bid, days 5-18; and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8, while patients in the T group received docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR). Forty-eight patients were recruited (23 in the XT group and 25 in the T group). TTP, median survival time (MST) and 1-year OS rate in the XT group and the T group were 7 months, 12 months, 47.6% and 3 months, 12 months, 39.6%, respectively. The TTP in the XT group was significantly longer compared to that in the T group (χ(2)=4.763, p=0.029). The RR and DCR in the XT group and T group were 13.0% (3/23), 78.3% (18/23) and 12.0% (3/25), 76% (19/25), respectively. The difference was not significant (p>0.05). The major side effects observed in the two groups were neutropenia, fatigue and nausea, and toxicities were mild to modest. No severe cases of hand-foot syndrome were observed in the XT group. In conclusion, compared with docetaxel alone, capecitabine combined with docetaxel for patients with previously treated NSCLC achieved a significantly longer TTP and this regimen was well tolerated. The relatively high median TTP, 1-year OS rate and DCR encourage further evaluation of this regimen in a randomized phase III trial.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.