Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22739940›Full record

ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2013

The influence of sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion, and timing of the heel prick on the pancreatitis-associated protein concentration in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Annette M M Vernooij-van Langen, J Gerard Loeber, Bert Elvers, Ralf H Triepels, Jos Roefs, Johan J Gille, Sandra Reijntjens, Edward Dompeling, Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Hungary-First-Year Experiences.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Annette M M Vernooij-van LangenDepartment of Research and Innovation, Atrium Medical Center, PO box 4446, 6401 CX Heerlen, The Netherlands. amm.vernooij+chopin@gmail.com
J Gerard Loeber
Bert Elvers
Ralf H Triepels
Jos Roefs
Johan J Gille
Sandra Reijntjens
Edward Dompeling
Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse
Atrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLSt. Elisabeth Hospital · CWUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) is currently discussed as a marker in newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it is not known if PAP concentrations are influenced by sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion or time of collection and what this would mean for NBS for CF.

methodsIn 2008 all newborns in part of the Netherlands were screened for CF by an IRT/PAP protocol. PAP concentration was determined by the MucoPAP ELISA (DynaBio), which was modified to a Dissociation Enhanced Lanthanide Fluoroimmunoassay (DELFIA) method following a protocol of PerkinElmer.

resultsIn healthy newborns, the median PAP concentration was 0.5 μg/l (Interquartile range (IQR 0.3-0.8) whereas this was 3.2 μg/l (IQR 2.0-12.5) in CF infants. PAP concentrations were lower in premature infants 0.94 and 0.91 times for 25 to 31 + 6 weeks GA and 32 to 36 + 6 weeks respectively. A higher PAP concentration was observed in low-birth-weight infants (<2500 gram)(p = 0.001), per 100 gram birth weight gained the PAP concentration decreased with 0.1 %. PAP levels were higher after a blood transfusion, the 95th percentile increased from 1.3 to 3.6 μg/l leading to a higher false-positive rate. The PAP concentration increased when newborn screening was performed more than 168 hours (day 7) after birth (β = 1.63), the 95th percentile increased from 1.3-1.6 μg/l to 4.0 μg/l after 168 hours (72,874 newborns were screened).

conclusionSex, birth weight, and gestational age lead to small differences in PAP concentrations without consequences for the screening algorithm. However, blood transfusion as well as performance of the heel prick after 168 hours (7 days) lead to clinically significant higher PAP levels and to a higher risk on a false-positive screening test result.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorBirth WeightCystic FibrosisFemaleGestational AgeHeelHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLectins, C-TypeMaleNeonatal ScreeningPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorLectins, C-TypePancreatitis-Associated ProteinsREG3A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22739940
OpenAlexW2085505904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.