Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22739572›Full record

ArticleThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2012

Detecting respiratory viruses in asymptomatic children.

Sonali Advani, Arnab Sengupta, Michael Forman, Alexandra Valsamakis, Aaron M Milstone

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Impact of community respiratory viral infections in urban children with asthma.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sonali AdvaniDivisions of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Arnab Sengupta
Michael Forman
Alexandra Valsamakis
Aaron M Milstone

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (KL2)KL2RR025006 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$12.9M
NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR025006-01NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViral respiratory infections are among the most common reasons for hospitalization of children in the United States. Our objective was to compare molecular and conventional methods in a cohort of hospitalized children with and without symptoms of respiratory viral illness (RVI).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants and toddlers hospitalized between December 2007 and March 2008 at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Five hundred sixty-nine of 641 patient visits (89%) were tested on admission. Conventional tests (immunochromatography, direct fluorescent antibody, shell vial and tube culture) were performed on all patients and nucleic acid tests (NATs) were performed on available samples (n = 306). Viruses were grouped into those routinely (group 1) and those not routinely (group 2) detected by conventional methods.

resultsIn children with RVI symptoms (n = 148), NATs identified a virus in 83% of specimens compared with 49% by conventional methods (P < 0.001), but detected a similar percentage of specimens with group 1 viruses (48.6% and 55.4%; P = 0.13) compared with conventional tests. In children without RVI symptoms (n = 158), NATs identified a virus in 41.7% of specimens compared with 4.4% by conventional tests (P < 0.001) and identified more group 1 viruses (9.5% and 4.4%; P = 0.03) compared with conventional tests. Group 2 viruses were identified by NATs in a similar percentage of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (25% and 32.3%; P = 0.20).

conclusionsMolecular assays may have several advantages over conventional methods for detecting respiratory viruses, including improved sensitivity and rapid detection, but given the high prevalence of positive results in children without RVI symptoms, results should be interpreted cautiously.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic InfectionsChild, PreschoolClinical Laboratory TechniquesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsUnited StatesVirologyVirus DiseasesViruses

Identifiers

PMID22739572
PMCPMC3505556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.