Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22739118›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular research2012

Cardioprotection evoked by remote ischaemic preconditioning is critically dependent on the activity of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones.

Svetlana Mastitskaya, Nephtali Marina, Andrey Gourine, Michael P Gilbey, K Michael Spyer, Anja G Teschemacher, Sergey Kasparov, Stefan Trapp, Gareth L Ackland, Alexander V Gourine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. GLP-1 activates KNature communications · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. GABAiScience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Svetlana MastitskayaNeuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Nephtali Marina
Andrey Gourine
Michael P Gilbey
K Michael Spyer
Anja G Teschemacher
Sergey Kasparov
Stefan Trapp
Gareth L Ackland
Alexander V Gourine
University College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBImperial College London · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEUCL Australia · AU

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/12/1/29080British Heart Foundation PG/09/064/27886Wellcome Trust 095064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsInnate mechanisms of inter-organ protection underlie the phenomenon of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RPc) in which episode(s) of ischaemia and reperfusion in tissues remote from the heart reduce myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury. The uncertainty surrounding the mechanism(s) underlying RPc centres on whether humoral factor(s) produced during ischaemia/reperfusion of remote tissue and released into the systemic circulation mediate RPc, or whether a neural signal is required. While these two hypotheses may not be incompatible, one approach to clarify the potential role of a neural pathway requires targeted disruption or activation of discrete central nervous substrate(s). METHODS AND

resultsUsing a rat model of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury in combination with viral gene transfer, pharmaco-, and optogenetics, we tested the hypothesis that RPc cardioprotection depends on the activity of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones and consequently an intact parasympathetic drive. For cell-specific silencing or activation, neurones of the brainstem dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve (DVMN) were targeted using viral vectors to express a Drosophila allatostatin receptor (AlstR) or light-sensitive fast channelrhodopsin variant (ChIEF), respectively. RPc cardioprotection, elicited by ischaemia/reperfusion of the limbs, was abolished when DVMN neurones transduced to express AlstR were silenced by selective ligand allatostatin or in conditions of systemic muscarinic receptor blockade with atropine. In the absence of remote ischaemia/reperfusion, optogenetic activation of DVMN neurones transduced to express ChIEF reduced infarct size, mimicking the effect of RPc.

conclusionThese data indicate a crucial dependence of RPc cardioprotection against ischaemia/reperfusion injury upon the activity of a distinct population of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones.

Indexed as

Autonomic Fibers, PreganglionicAction PotentialsAdenoviridaeAnimalsAtropineBrain StemConstrictionDisease Models, AnimalDrosophila ProteinsGenetic VectorsHeartHindlimbIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialLentivirusMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsallatostatinAstA-R1 protein, DrosophilaAtropineDrosophila ProteinsMuscarinic AntagonistsNeuropeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, NeuropeptideRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID22739118
PMCPMC3422080
OpenAlexW2082878444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.