ReviewScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2012
Suspicion and treatment of severe sepsis. An overview of the prehospital chain of care.
Review in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical validation of continuous glucose monitoring in glycemic management of critically ill sepsis patients: A prospective randomized clinical study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Trial
- Randomised feasibility study of prehospital recognition and antibiotics for emergency patients with sepsis (PhRASe).Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Article
- Extension of Selection Time for the Emergency Destination of Patients with a Fever Due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Difference-in-differences Analysis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Prehospital administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics for sepsis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Epidemiology and patient predictors of infection and sepsis in the prehospital setting.Intensive care medicine · 2020Article
- Screening strategies to identify sepsis in the prehospital setting: a validation study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020Article
- Prehospital Antibiotics Improve Morbidity and Mortality of Emergency Medical Service Patients with Sepsis.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method.BMC medicine · 2018Article
- Prehospital recognition and antibiotics for 999 patients with sepsis: protocol for a feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2018Article
- Dispatch and prehospital transport for acute septic patients: an observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017Observational
- Severe sepsis and septic shock in pre-hospital emergency medicine: survey results of medical directors of emergency medical services concerning antibiotics, blood cultures and algorithms.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study.Emergency medicine international · 2016Article
- Recognizing and managing sepsis: what needs to be done?BMC medicine · 2015Article
- EMS patients and walk-in patients presenting with severe sepsis: differences in management and outcome.Southern medical journal · 2014Article
- [The golden hour of sepsis: initial therapy should start in the prehospital setting].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014Review
- The potential for PCR based testing to improve diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.Current infectious disease reports · 2013Article
- Characterization of Children with Septic Shock Cared for by Emergency Medical Services.Prehospital emergency careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition where the risk of death has been reported to be even higher than that associated with the major complications of atherosclerosis, i.e. myocardial infarction and stroke. In all three conditions, early treatment could limit organ dysfunction and thereby improve the prognosis.
aimTo describe what has been published in the literature a/ with regard to the association between delay until start of treatment and outcome in sepsis with the emphasis on the pre-hospital phase and b/ to present published data and the opportunity to improve various links in the pre-hospital chain of care in sepsis.
methodsA literature search was performed on the PubMed, Embase (Ovid SP) and Cochrane Library databases.
resultsIn overall terms, we found a small number of articles (n = 12 of 1,162 unique hits) which addressed the prehospital phase. For each hour of delay until the start of antibiotics, the prognosis appeared to become worse. However, there was no evidence that prehospital treatment improved the prognosis.Studies indicated that about half of the patients with severe sepsis used the emergency medical service (EMS) for transport to hospital. Patients who used the EMS experienced a shorter delay to treatment with antibiotics and the start of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Among EMS-transported patients, those in whom the EMS staff already suspected sepsis at the scene had a shorter delay to treatment with antibiotics and the start of EGDT.There are insufficient data on other links in the prehospital chain of care, i.e. patients, bystanders and dispatchers.
conclusionSevere sepsis is a life-threatening condition. Previous studies suggest that, with every hour of delay until the start of antibiotics, the prognosis deteriorates. About half of the patients use the EMS. We need to know more about the present situation with regard to the different links in the prehospital chain of care in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.