Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22738027›Full record

ReviewScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2012

Suspicion and treatment of severe sepsis. An overview of the prehospital chain of care.

Johan Herlitz, Angela Bång, Birgitta Wireklint-Sundström, Christer Axelsson, Anders Bremer, Magnus Hagiwara, Anders Jonsson, Lars Lundberg, Björn-Ove Suserud, Lars Ljungström

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Screening strategies to identify sepsis in the prehospital setting: a validation study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dispatch and prehospital transport for acute septic patients: an observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [The golden hour of sepsis: initial therapy should start in the prehospital setting].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johan HerlitzSchool of Health Sciences, Research Centre PreHospen, University of Borås, The Prehospital Research Centre of Western Sweden, SE 501 90, Borås, Sweden. johan.herlitz@gu.se
Angela Bång
Birgitta Wireklint-Sundström
Christer Axelsson
Anders Bremer
Magnus Hagiwara
Anders Jonsson
Lars Lundberg
Björn-Ove Suserud
Lars Ljungström

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition where the risk of death has been reported to be even higher than that associated with the major complications of atherosclerosis, i.e. myocardial infarction and stroke. In all three conditions, early treatment could limit organ dysfunction and thereby improve the prognosis.

aimTo describe what has been published in the literature a/ with regard to the association between delay until start of treatment and outcome in sepsis with the emphasis on the pre-hospital phase and b/ to present published data and the opportunity to improve various links in the pre-hospital chain of care in sepsis.

methodsA literature search was performed on the PubMed, Embase (Ovid SP) and Cochrane Library databases.

resultsIn overall terms, we found a small number of articles (n = 12 of 1,162 unique hits) which addressed the prehospital phase. For each hour of delay until the start of antibiotics, the prognosis appeared to become worse. However, there was no evidence that prehospital treatment improved the prognosis.Studies indicated that about half of the patients with severe sepsis used the emergency medical service (EMS) for transport to hospital. Patients who used the EMS experienced a shorter delay to treatment with antibiotics and the start of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Among EMS-transported patients, those in whom the EMS staff already suspected sepsis at the scene had a shorter delay to treatment with antibiotics and the start of EGDT.There are insufficient data on other links in the prehospital chain of care, i.e. patients, bystanders and dispatchers.

conclusionSevere sepsis is a life-threatening condition. Previous studies suggest that, with every hour of delay until the start of antibiotics, the prognosis deteriorates. About half of the patients use the EMS. We need to know more about the present situation with regard to the different links in the prehospital chain of care in sepsis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEmergency Medical ServicesHumansPrognosisSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID22738027
PMCPMC3441306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.