Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22737991›Full record

ReviewScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2012

Initial emergency department diagnosis and management of adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Sarah M Perman, Munish Goyal, David F Gaieski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Performance of a new combination of blood culture vials in sepsis detection: a 2-year retrospective comparison.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sepsis: in search of cure.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2016
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah M PermanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.
Munish Goyal
David F Gaieski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe sepsis is a medical emergency affecting up to 18 million individuals world wide, with an annual incidence of 750,000 in North America alone. Mortality ranges between 28-50% of those individuals stricken by severe sepsis. Sepsis is a time critical illness, requiring early identification and prompt intervention in order to improve outcomes. This observation has led to increased awareness and education in the field of Emergency Medicine; it has also led to the implementation of critical interventions early in the course of patient management, specifically Early-Goal Directed Therapy, and rapid administration of appropriate antimicrobials. This review begins with a brief summary of the pathophysiology of sepsis, and then addresses the fundamental clinical aspects of ED identification and resuscitation of the septic patient.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCardiotonic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyEmergency Service, HospitalFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexShock, SepticSurvival RateTime FactorsTriageVasoconstrictor AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCardiotonic AgentsVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID22737991
PMCPMC3507802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.