Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22737606›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2012

Trial Watch: Adoptive cell transfer immunotherapy.

Lorenzo Galluzzi, Erika Vacchelli, Alexander Eggermont, Wolf Herve Fridman, Jerome Galon, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Eric Tartour, Laurence Zitvogel, Guido Kroemer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02661685 (An Immunotherapy for Metastatic Cancer Patients by Adoptive Transfer of Autologous IKDC-like Cells - Phase 1 Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02661685 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

An Immunotherapy for Metastatic Cancer Patients by Adoptive Transfer of Autologous IKDC-like Cells - Phase 1 Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Defense Medical Center, TaiwanRan2016 to 2019Enrolled6ConditionsNeoplasm MetastasisArmsautologous IKDC-like cells
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Specific immunotherapy in hepatocellular cancer: A systematic review.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Facts and Hopes: CAR T-Cell Therapy and Immune Contexture in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The progress of immunotherapy for glioblastoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo GalluzziINSERM; U848; Villejuif, France ; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif, France ; Université Paris-Sud/Paris XI; Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Erika Vacchelli
Alexander Eggermont
Wolf Herve Fridman
Jerome Galon
Catherine Sautès-Fridman
Eric Tartour
Laurence Zitvogel
Guido Kroemer
Inserm · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last two decades, several approaches for the activation of the immune system against cancer have been developed. These include rather unselective maneuvers such as the systemic administration of immunostimulatory agents (e.g., interleukin-2) as well as targeted interventions, encompassing highly specific monoclonal antibodies, vaccines and cell-based therapies. Among the latter, adoptive cell transfer (ACT) involves the selection of autologous lymphocytes with antitumor activity, their expansion/activation ex vivo, and their reinfusion into the patient, often in the context of lymphodepleting regimens (to minimize endogenous immunosuppression). Such autologous cells can be isolated from tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or generated by manipulating circulating lymphocytes for the expression of tumor-specific T-cell receptors. In addition, autologous lymphocytes can be genetically engineered to prolong their in vivo persistence, to boost antitumor responses and/or to minimize side effects. ACT has recently been shown to be associated with a consistent rate of durable regressions in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma patients and holds great promises in several other oncological settings. In this Trial Watch, we will briefly review the scientific rationale behind ACT and discuss the progress of recent clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of adoptive cell transfer as an anticancer therapy.

Identifiers

PMID22737606
PMCPMC3382856
OpenAlexW2040910597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.