Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22737086›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

In vivo effects of histone H3 depletion on nucleosome occupancy and position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Andrea J Gossett, Jason D Lieb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Structure of the ISW1a complex bound to the dinucleosome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reduced histone gene copy number disruptsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea J GossettDepartment of Biology, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jason D Lieb
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Uniting disparate fields to explore transcription factor binding dynamicsR01GM072518 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIEB, JASON D · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072518NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM072518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae established that depletion of histone H4 results in the genome-wide transcriptional de-repression of hundreds of genes. To probe the mechanism of this transcriptional de-repression, we depleted nucleosomes in vivo by conditional repression of histone H3 transcription. We then measured the resulting changes in transcription by RNA-seq and in chromatin organization by MNase-seq. This experiment also bears on the degree to which trans-acting factors and DNA-encoded elements affect nucleosome position and occupancy in vivo. We identified ∼60,000 nucleosomes genome wide, and we classified ∼2,000 as having preferentially reduced occupancy following H3 depletion and ∼350 as being preferentially retained. We found that the in vivo influence of DNA sequences that favor or disfavor nucleosome occupancy increases following histone H3 depletion, demonstrating that nucleosome density contributes to moderating the influence of DNA sequence on nucleosome formation in vivo. To identify factors important for influencing nucleosome occupancy and position, we compared our data to 40 existing whole-genome data sets. Factors associated with promoters, such as histone acetylation and H2A.z incorporation, were enriched at sites of nucleosome loss. Nucleosome retention was linked to stabilizing marks such as H3K36me2. Notably, the chromatin remodeler Isw2 was uniquely associated with retained occupancy and altered positioning, consistent with Isw2 stabilizing histone-DNA contacts and centering nucleosomes on available DNA in vivo. RNA-seq revealed a greater number of de-repressed genes (∼2,500) than previous studies, and these genes exhibited reduced nucleosome occupancy in their promoters. In summary, we identify factors likely to influence nucleosome stability under normal growth conditions and the specific genomic locations at which they act. We find that DNA-encoded nucleosome stability and chromatin composition dictate which nucleosomes will be lost under conditions of limiting histone protein and that this, in turn, governs which genes are susceptible to a loss of regulatory fidelity.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyTranscription, GeneticAcetylationAdenosine TriphosphatasesDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome, FungalHistonesNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Analysis, RNAAdenosine TriphosphatasesDNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesISWI proteinNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesRepressor ProteinsRSC complex, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSIR2 protein, S cerevisiaeSirtuin 2Transcription FactorsTUP1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22737086
PMCPMC3380831
OpenAlexW2083130684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.