Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22736353›Full record

ReviewElectrophoresis2012

Electrophoresis for the analysis of heparin purity and quality.

Nicola Volpi, Francesca Maccari, Jiraporn Suwan, Robert J Linhardt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Electrophoresis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Techniques for Detection of Clinical Used Heparins.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola VolpiDepartment of Biology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy. volpi@unimo.it
Francesca Maccari
Jiraporn Suwan
Robert J Linhardt
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

SEQUENCING THE POLYSACCHARIDE COMPONENT OF PROTEOGLYCANSR01GM038060 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LINHARDT, ROBERT J · 1988 to 2012
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adulteration of raw heparin with oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) in 2007-2008 produced a global crisis resulting in extensive revisions to the pharmacopeia monographs and prompting the FDA to recommend the development of additional methods for the analysis of heparin purity. As a consequence, a wide variety of innovative analytical approaches have been developed for the quality assurance and purity of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins. This review discusses recent developments in electrophoresis techniques available for the sensitive separation, detection, and partial structural characterization of heparin contaminants. In particular, this review summarizes recent publications on heparin quality and related impurity analysis using electrophoretic separations such as capillary electrophoresis (CE) of intact polysaccharides and hexosamines derived from their acidic hydrolysis, and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) for the separation of heparin samples without and in the presence of its relatively specific depolymerization process with nitrous acid treatment.

Indexed as

Chondroitin SulfatesDrug ContaminationElectrophoresisHeparinChondroitin SulfatesHeparin

Identifiers

PMID22736353
PMCPMC3495621
OpenAlexW1599871137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.