ArticleWorld journal of surgery2012
Fast-track for the modern colorectal department.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduction of Postoperative Complications in Pancreatic Surgery by Standardizing Perioperative Management: An Observational Cohort Study.Visceral medicine · 2024Article
- Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy program in a prospective multicenter study: compliance and key components for success.World journal of urology · 2020Article
- Implementation of day of surgery admission for rectal cancer surgery in Ireland following a national centralisation programme.Irish journal of medical science · 2019Article
- Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, fast-track or enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) colorectal pathways have been utilized to achieve faster recovery and discharge from hospital with swift resumption of normal activities of daily living without an increase in complications or readmissions. Despite the large body of evidence available, however, adoption of the fast-track methodology in current surgical practice has been slow and sporadic. As outlined by a recent Cochrane review, practice uptake has mostly focused on individual component uptake. Therefore, instead of repeating what already has been established in the literature pertaining to colorectal fast-track surgery, the aim of this article is to interrogate the evidence concerning the individual components of ERAS pathways as they relate to a contemporary surgical department to determine the most relevant critical components for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in modern surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22736342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.