Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2012
From in vitro EC₅₀ to in vivo dose-response for antiretrovirals using an HIV disease model. Part I: a framework.
Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing Class-Specific Exposure-Viral Load Suppression Response of HIV Antiretrovirals Using A Model-Based Meta-Analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2016Pooled it
- Exploiting Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Methods for Optimizing and Accelerating Drug Development of Innovative Anti-Infectives.ChemMedChem · 2026Review
- Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Modeling of HIV Virus-host Infection Dynamics in Patients Undergoing Antiretroviral Monotherapy.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Integrated population pharmacokinetic/viral dynamic modelling of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 treatment-naïve patients.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2014Article
- Model based design and analysis of phase II HIV-1 trials.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013Article
- From in vitro EC₅₀ to in vivo dose-response for antiretrovirals using an HIV disease model. Part II: application to drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasma drug concentrations and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) data from short-term monotherapy trials in antiretroviral (ARV) naïve/experienced HIV-infected patients for one drug (i.e., lead case, a representative drug for a given class) from four distinct classes of ARV drugs [non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs); nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NtRTIs); co-receptor antagonists (CRAs); and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs)] were obtained. For each drug (the lead case; for example, etravirine for NNRTIs), the pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) disease model was used to estimate the in vivo IC₅₀ value based on the relationship between plasma drug concentrations and HIV-1 RNA decline. The disease model was a mechanistic viral dynamic model with the addition of a transduction delay for HIV-1 RNA decay. The model characterized the observed time-course of plasma drug concentrations and HIV-1 RNA in each lead case trial reasonably well. The estimated viral dynamic parameters were in good agreement with the literature values. The scaling factor (SF) was calculated as a ratio using the estimated in vivo IC₅₀ value and protein binding corrected EC₅₀ value for the lead case. For NNRTIs, the calculated SF was found to be 9.47 based on etravirine analysis. Using the same approach, the SF for CRAs (maraviroc), INSTIs (GSK1349572), and NtRTIs (tenofovir) were 4.35, 1.63, and 0.27. The SF is reflective of the uncertainty between in vitro measurement of drug potency and the specific model-based drug potency parameter (IC₅₀). The use of SF and PK-PD disease models can be a valuable tool to predict dose-response of NMEs and support rational dose selection for monotherapy trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.