Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22736302›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2012

From in vitro EC₅₀ to in vivo dose-response for antiretrovirals using an HIV disease model. Part I: a framework.

Jing Fang, Pravin R Jadhav

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Model based design and analysis of phase II HIV-1 trials.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing FangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Pravin R Jadhav
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma drug concentrations and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) data from short-term monotherapy trials in antiretroviral (ARV) naïve/experienced HIV-infected patients for one drug (i.e., lead case, a representative drug for a given class) from four distinct classes of ARV drugs [non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs); nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NtRTIs); co-receptor antagonists (CRAs); and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs)] were obtained. For each drug (the lead case; for example, etravirine for NNRTIs), the pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) disease model was used to estimate the in vivo IC₅₀ value based on the relationship between plasma drug concentrations and HIV-1 RNA decline. The disease model was a mechanistic viral dynamic model with the addition of a transduction delay for HIV-1 RNA decay. The model characterized the observed time-course of plasma drug concentrations and HIV-1 RNA in each lead case trial reasonably well. The estimated viral dynamic parameters were in good agreement with the literature values. The scaling factor (SF) was calculated as a ratio using the estimated in vivo IC₅₀ value and protein binding corrected EC₅₀ value for the lead case. For NNRTIs, the calculated SF was found to be 9.47 based on etravirine analysis. Using the same approach, the SF for CRAs (maraviroc), INSTIs (GSK1349572), and NtRTIs (tenofovir) were 4.35, 1.63, and 0.27. The SF is reflective of the uncertainty between in vitro measurement of drug potency and the specific model-based drug potency parameter (IC₅₀). The use of SF and PK-PD disease models can be a valuable tool to predict dose-response of NMEs and support rational dose selection for monotherapy trials.

Indexed as

AdenineAnti-HIV AgentsCyclohexanesDolutegravirDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50MaleMaravirocModels, BiologicalNitrilesAdenineAnti-HIV AgentsCyclohexanesDolutegraviretravirineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingMaravirocNitrilesOrganophosphonatesOxazinesPiperazinesPyridazinesPyridonesPyrimidinesRNA, ViralTenofovirTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID22736302
OpenAlexW2052986630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.