Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22736288›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013

Does the surgeon's experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?

Astrid Herrero, Claire Philippe, Françoise Guillon, Bertrand Millat, Frédéric Borie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Upfront Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: What Are the Risk Factors of Failure?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Choledocholithiasis-a new clinical pathway.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Astrid HerreroDepartment of Digestive Surgery, St. Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France. astrid.herrero@uclouvain.be
Claire Philippe
Françoise Guillon
Bertrand Millat
Frédéric Borie
Hôpital Saint Eloi · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis with respect to the surgeon's experience.

methodsFrom January 1994 to December 2006, 130 patients underwent laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones found with intraoperative cholangiography. Two types of surgeons were defined: junior surgeons with fewer than ten laparoscopic common bile duct explorations performed and experienced surgeons with more than ten. The two patient populations (n = 65 in each group) were similar in regard to demographic data, clinical presentations (complicated or not), and ASA score.

resultsResults show that junior surgeons had significantly more patients with a common bile duct (CBD) diameter <7 mm compared to experienced surgeons (66% vs. 38%; p = 0.002). Primary closure of choledochotomy was performed by senior rather than junior surgeons significantly more often (87.5% vs. 69%; p = 0.05). Mean operating time was found to be longer for junior operators than for experienced surgeons (220 ± 71 min vs. 169 ± 71 min; p = 0.0006). There was no difference between group 1 (juniors) and group 2 (experienced surgeons) in regard to laparotomy conversion rate (9% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.1), complete common bile duct clearance (98% vs. 100%, p = ns), postoperative complications (two bile leaks in group 1 and one in group 2), and hospital stay (9 days vs. 7.5 days). In multivariate analysis, the transcystic approach was not influenced by the surgeon's experience. Experienced surgeons performed choledochotomy with primary closure more easily [RR = 3 (range = 1.1-8); p = 0.04]. Complicated presentations [RR = 2 (0.7-3); p = 0.08] and CBD diameter [RR = 2.5 (0.96-7); p = 0.06] influenced the choice of type of closure of choledochotomy without any significant value.

conclusionSurgeon's experience influenced operating time and type of choledochotomy closure performed but had no influence on postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholedocholithiasisClinical CompetenceGastroenterologyHumansMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWound Closure Techniques

Identifiers

PMID22736288
OpenAlexW2019855095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.