Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22735943›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012

Therapeutic proteins.

Dimiter S Dimitrov

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
49.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 336 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Synthesis of Oligonucleotide Conjugates Employing a Diselenide Linker.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA Dendron Tagging as a Universal Way to Deliver Proteins to Cells.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimiter S DimitrovProtein Interactions Group, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA. dimiter.dimitrov@nih.gov
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Human Monoclonal Antibodies Against CancerZIABC010701 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DIMITROV, DIMITER S · 2009 to 2017
$6.9M
Antibody-based therapeutics and vaccines against AIDSZIABC011155 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DIMITROV, DIMITER S · 2009 to 2017
$2.6M
Human Monoclonal Antibodies and Antibody-Guided NanoparticlesZ01BC010701 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DIMITROV, DIMITER S · 2006 to 2008
$2.6M
Viral Envelope Glycoprotein Interactions with ReceptorsZ01BC010257 · BC · BASIC SCIENCES · PI DIMITROV, DIMTER S. · 1996 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010257Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-based therapeutics are highly successful in clinic and currently enjoy unprecedented recognition of their potential. More than 100 genuine and similar number of modified therapeutic proteins are approved for clinical use in the European Union and the USA with 2010 sales of US$108 bln; monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) accounted for almost half (48%) of the sales. Based on their pharmacological activity, they can be divided into five groups: (a) replacing a protein that is deficient or abnormal; (b) augmenting an existing pathway; (c) providing a novel function or activity; (d) interfering with a molecule or organism; and (e) delivering other compounds or proteins, such as a radionuclide, cytotoxic drug, or effector proteins. Therapeutic proteins can also be grouped based on their molecular types that include antibody-based drugs, Fc fusion proteins, anticoagulants, blood factors, bone morphogenetic proteins, engineered protein scaffolds, enzymes, growth factors, hormones, interferons, interleukins, and thrombolytics. They can also be classified based on their molecular mechanism of activity as (a) binding non-covalently to target, e.g., mAbs; (b) affecting covalent bonds, e.g., enzymes; and (c) exerting activity without specific interactions, e.g., serum albumin. Most protein therapeutics currently on the market are recombinant and hundreds of them are in clinical trials for therapy of cancers, immune disorders, infections, and other diseases. New engineered proteins, including bispecific mAbs and multispecific fusion proteins, mAbs conjugated with small molecule drugs, and proteins with optimized pharmacokinetics, are currently under development. However, in the last several decades, there are no conceptually new methodological developments comparable, e.g., to genetic engineering leading to the development of recombinant therapeutic proteins. It appears that a paradigm change in methodologies and understanding of mechanisms is needed to overcome major challenges, including resistance to therapy, access to targets, complexity of biological systems, and individual variations.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringAntibodies, MonoclonalAntithrombin IIIEuropean UnionHumansImmune System DiseasesImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsUnited StatesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntithrombin IIIImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22735943
PMCPMC6988726
OpenAlexW4243952253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.