Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22735899›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012

Improved diagnosis of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections using the HB&L UROQUATTRO™ system.

C Fontana, M Favaro, M C Bossa, S Minelli, A Altieri, M Pelliccioni, F Falcione, L Di Traglia, O Cicchetti, C Favalli

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of the Alfred™ turbidity monitoring system (Alifax®) following sonication in the diagnosis of central venous catheter colonization.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C FontanaDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. carla.fontana@uniroma2.it
M Favaro
M C Bossa
S Minelli
A Altieri
M Pelliccioni
F Falcione
L Di Traglia
O Cicchetti
C Favalli
Policlinico Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in febrile patients with indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) needs improvement. To diagnose CRBSIs more efficiently, we have developed a novel culture approach using the catheter tips removed from febrile patients. CVCs and blood cultures from 1,070 patients with only CVC-related infections were obtained over a period of 3 years (January 2009 to December 2011). The CVCs were evaluated by a semi-quantitative catheter culture method according to Maki's method and by our novel method, which is based on the use of the HB&L UROQUATTRO™ system (Alifax, Padova, Italy). Using our new method, 571 (571/1,070) of the infections were confirmed as CRBSIs. The remaining 487 patients had infections that were associated with hematologic malignancies, neutropenia, prior exposure to antibiotics, and a decreased CVC removal rate. Twelve samples were identified as false-positives. The percentage of patients with CRBSIs confirmed using the HB&L UROQUATTRO™ system was 53.36 % versus 34.95 % (p-value 0.004) using Maki's method (374/1,070 CVC Maki-positive samples). Our results indicate that our new culture method allows for an improved CRBSI diagnosis rate. A significant number of tip cultures (18.41 %) tested positive for CRBSIs using our system but were negative when tested using Maki's method. Moreover, the use of the HB&L UROQUATTRO™ system allowed us to significantly reduce diagnosis time; a negative CRBSI diagnosis could be made within 6 h and a positive diagnosis could be made within 22-28 h.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersDiagnostic ErrorsHumansMicrobiological TechniquesSepsisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22735899
OpenAlexW1990547298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.