Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22735431›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2012

Effect of a stepped-care intervention approach on weight loss in adults: a randomized clinical trial.

John M Jakicic, Deborah F Tate, Wei Lang, Kelli K Davis, Kristen Polzien, Amy D Rickman, Karen Erickson, Rebecca H Neiberg, Eric A Finkelstein

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00714168 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of a Stepped-care Approach to Long-term Weight Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2008 to 2011Enrolled363ConditionsObesityArmsStandard Behavioral Weight Loss Program, Stepped-Care Weight Loss Program
NCT01803737 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Campaign Intervention Compared to a Standard Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention in Overweight and Obese Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2013 to 2013Enrolled26ConditionsWeight LossArmsStandard Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention (SBWL), Campaign Intervention (CI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Early Weight Loss in Behavioral Treatment Predicts Later Rate of Weight Loss and Response to Pharmacotherapy.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

John M JakicicDepartment of Health and Physical Activity, Physical Activity and Weight Management Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. jjakicic@pitt.edu
Deborah F Tate
Wei Lang
Kelli K Davis
Kristen Polzien
Amy D Rickman
Karen Erickson
Rebecca H Neiberg
Eric A Finkelstein
University of Pittsburgh · USWake Forest University · USNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GH

Funding

The Effect of a Stepped-Care Approach to Long-Term Weight LossR01HL084400 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JAKICIC, JOHN M · 2007 to 2011
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL084400NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextGiven the obesity epidemic, effective but resource-efficient weight loss treatments are needed. Stepped-treatment approaches customize interventions based on milestone completion and can be more effective while costing less to administer than conventional treatment approaches.

objectiveTo determine whether a stepped-care weight loss intervention (STEP) compared with a standard behavioral weight loss intervention (SBWI) would result in greater weight loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA randomized clinical trial of 363 overweight and obese adults (body mass index: 25-<40; age: 18-55 years, 33% nonwhite, and 83% female) who were randomized to SBWI (n = 165) or STEP (n = 198) at 2 universities affiliated with academic medical centers in the United States (Step-Up Study). Participants were enrolled between May 2008 and February 2010 and data collection was completed by September 2011.

interventionsAll participants were placed on a low-calorie diet, prescribed increases in physical activity, and attended group counseling sessions ranging from weekly to monthly during an 18-month period. The SBWI group was assigned to a fixed program. Counseling frequency, type, and weight loss strategies could be modified every 3 months for the STEP group in response to observed weight loss as it related to weight loss goals.

main outcome measureMean change in weight over 18 months. Additional outcomes included resting heart rate and blood pressure, waist circumference, body composition, fitness, physical activity, dietary intake, and cost of the program.

resultsOf the 363 participants randomized, 260 (71.6%) provided a measure of mean change in weight over 18 months. The 18-month intervention resulted in weight decreasing from 93.1 kg (95% CI, 91.0 to 95.2 kg) to 85.6 kg (95% CI, 83.4 to 87.7 kg) (P < .001) in the SBWI group and from 92.7 kg (95% CI, 90.8 to 94.6 kg) to 86.4 kg (95% CI, 84.5 to 88.4 kg) in the STEP group (P < .001). The percentage change in weight from baseline to 18 months was -8.1% (95% CI, -9.4% to -6.9%) in the SBWI group (P < .001) compared with -6.9% (95% CI, -8.0% to -5.8%) in the STEP group (P < .001). Although the between-group difference in 18-month weight loss was not statistically different (-1.3 kg [95% CI, -2.8 to 0.2 kg]; P = .09), there was a significant group × time interaction effect (P = .03). The cost per participant was $1357 (95% CI, $1272 to $1442) for the SBWI group vs $785 (95% CI, $739 to $830) for the STEP group (P < .001). Both groups had significant and comparable improvements in resting heart rate, blood pressure level, and fitness.

conclusionsAmong overweight and obese adults, the use of SBWI resulted in a greater mean weight loss than STEP over 18 months. Compared with SBWI, STEP resulted in clinically meaningful weight loss that cost less to implement.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00714168.

Indexed as

Weight LossAdolescentAdultBlood PressureBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCost SavingsCounselingDiet, ReducingExerciseFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity

Identifiers

PMID22735431
PMCPMC4132634
OpenAlexW2049460685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.