Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22734511›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2012

Investigating ligand-receptor interactions at bilayer surface using electronic absorption spectroscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Navneet Dogra, Xuelian Li, Punit Kohli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Biosensors for the Detection of Food Pathogens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Navneet DograDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, United States.
Xuelian Li
Punit Kohli
Southern Illinois University Carbondale · US

Funding

Super-high resolution optical nanoscopy based on microlensesR15GM106364 · NIGMS · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE · PI KOHLI, PUNIT · 2013 to 2014
$372k
Investigating Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer in Conjugated LiposomesR15GM080711 · NIGMS · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE · PI KOHLI, PUNIT · 2007 to 2010
$261k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 8071101NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM080711NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM106364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate interactions between receptors and ligands at bilayer surface of polydiacetylene (PDA) liposomal nanoparticles using changes in electronic absorption spectroscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). We study the effect of mode of linkage (covalent versus noncovalent) between the receptor and liposome bilayer. We also examine the effect of size-dependent interactions between liposome and analyte through electronic absorption and FRET responses. Glucose (receptor) molecules were either covalently or noncovalently attached at the bilayer of nanoparticles, and they provided selectivity for molecular interactions between glucose and glycoprotein ligands of E. coli. These interactions induced stress on conjugated PDA chain which resulted in changes (blue to red) in the absorption spectrum of PDA. The changes in electronic absorbance also led to changes in FRET efficiency between conjugated PDA chains (acceptor) and fluorophores (Sulphorhodamine-101) (donor) attached to the bilayer surface. Interestingly, we did not find significant differences in UV-vis and FRET responses for covalently and noncovalently bound glucose to liposomes following their interactions with E. coli. We attributed these results to close proximity of glucose receptor molecules to the liposome bilayer surface such that induced stress were similar in both the cases. We also found that PDA emission from direct excitation mechanism was ~2-10 times larger than that of the FRET-based response. These differences in emission signals were attributed to three major reasons: nonspecific interactions between E. coli and liposomes, size differences between analyte and liposomes, and a much higher PDA concentration with respect to sulforhodamine (SR-101). We have proposed a model to explain our experimental observations. Our fundamental studies reported here will help in enhancing our knowledge regarding interactions involved between soft particles at molecular levels.

Indexed as

Fluorescence Resonance Energy TransferEscherichia coliGlucoseLigandsLipid BilayersLiposomesNanoparticlesParticle SizePolyacetylene PolymerPolymersPolyynesRhodaminesSpectrophotometry, UltravioletSurface PropertiesGlucoseLigandsLipid BilayersLiposomesPolyacetylene PolymerpolydiacetylenePolymersPolyynesRhodaminessulforhodamine 101

Identifiers

PMID22734511
PMCPMC3439585
OpenAlexW1970333820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.