Trial reportInternational wound journal2013
Comparison of silver nylon wound dressing and silver sulfadiazine in partial burn wound therapy.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Antiseptics for burns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- [Expert consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition)Ⅰ: pre-hospital first aid and non-surgical treatment].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2024Article
- Consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition).Burns & trauma · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy of Agicoat in the treatment of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites of burn patients.International journal of burns and trauma · 2021Article
- The Effects of Silver Sulfadiazine on Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Article
- Antiseptics for burns: a review of the evidence.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2018Article
- In Vitro Assessment of the Antibacterial Potential of Silver Nano-Coatings on Cotton Gauzes for Prevention of Wound Infections.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Healing of burn wounds by topical treatment: A randomized controlled comparison between silver sulfadiazine and nano-crystalline silver.Journal of basic and clinical pharmacy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims to perform a comparative assessment of two types of burn wound treatment. To do the assessment, patients with partial thickness burn wounds with total body surface area <40% were simple randomised to treat with nanocrystalline silver nylon wound dressing or silver sulfadiazine cream. Efficacy of treatment, use of analgesics, number of wound dressing change, wound infection and final hospitalisation cost were evaluated. The study showed silver nylon wound dressing significantly reduced length of hospital stay, analgesic use, wound infection and inflammation compared with silver sulfadiazine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.