ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2012
Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential increase of the U.S. total fertility rate resulting from restorative treatment of unresolved subfertility: a simulation study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Fertility awareness methods and waiting conduct in idiopathic infertility: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
- Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Creighton Model FertilityCare™ System Follow-up Form to Brazilian Portuguese.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Article
- Natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology) for infertility: take-home baby rate and clinical outcomes in a 5-year single-center cohort of 1,310 couples.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- An Evaluation of Controversial Statements in Etica Teologica Della Vita.The Linacre quarterly · 2024Article
- The Barren Bear Fruit: Good News for Sterile Couples.The Linacre quarterly · 2023Article
- Maternity After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Can the Use of Biological Fertility Indicators Help? Our Own Experience and Literature-based Recommendations.The Linacre quarterly · 2022Article
- Characteristics of menstrual cycles with or without intercourse in women with no known subfertility.Human reproduction open · 2022Article
- Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- International Natural Procreative Technology Evaluation and Surveillance of Treatment for Subfertility (iNEST): enrollment and methods.Human reproduction open · 2022Article
- Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility in two family medicine clinics in New England, an observational study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
- Cervical mucus patterns and the fertile window in women without known subfertility: a pooled analysis of three cohorts.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Menstrual bleeding, cycle length, and follicular and luteal phase lengths in women without known subfertility: A pooled analysis of three cohorts.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2020Article
- Healthy Singleton Pregnancies From Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) After Failed IVF.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
- Towards the Clinical Evaluation of the Luteal Phase in Fertile Women: A Preliminary Study of Normative Urinary Hormone Profiles.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window.Frontiers in medicine · 2017Article
- Medical Students' Knowledge of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods of Family Planning.Frontiers in medicine · 2017Article
- How Humanae vitae has advanced reproductive health.The Linacre quarterly · 2014Article
- NFP and NaProTechnology.The Linacre quarterly · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the outcomes of women with infertility or miscarriage treated with natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology or NPT), a systematic medical approach to promoting conception in vivo; and to compare the outcomes with those previously published from a general practice in Ireland.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingAn urban Canadian primary care practice in which the physician had a part-time practice in NPT.
participantsCouples with infertility or recurrent miscarriage who received treatment in the practice between August 2000 and July 2006.
interventionAll couples were taught to identify the fertile time of their menstrual cycles using the Creighton Model FertilityCare System (CrMS) and completed a standard NPT evaluation. Many also received additional medical treatment to enhance conception in vivo.
main outcome measuresLive birth was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included conceptions, multiple births, low birth weight, and prematurity.
resultsA total of 108 couples received NPT and were included in the analysis, of which 19 (18%) reported having 2 or more previously unexplained miscarriages. The average female age was 35.4 years. Couples had been attempting to conceive for a mean of 3.2 years. Twentytwo participants (20%) had previously given birth; 24 (22%) had previous intrauterine insemination; and 9 (8%) had previous assisted reproductive technology. The cumulative adjusted proportion of first live births for those completing up to 24 months of NPT treatment was 66 per 100 couples, and the crude proportion was 38%. The cumulative adjusted proportion of first conceptions was 73 per 100 couples, and the crude proportion was 47%. Of the 51 couples who conceived, 12 couples (24%) conceived with CrMS instruction alone, 35 (69%) conceived with CrMS and NPT medical treatment, and 4 (8%) conceived after additional surgical treatment. All births were singleton births; 54% were born at 37 weeks' gestation or later; and 78% had birth weights of 2500 g or greater.
conclusionNatural procreative technology in a family physician's office was effective in treating infertility and miscarriage with outcomes that were comparable to those in an NPT general practice in Ireland. Larger multicentre prospective studies to compare NPT directly to other forms of infertility treatment are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22734170PMC3352813W2134815623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.