Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22733534›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2012

PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?

Antti Saraste, Sami Kajander, Chunlei Han, Sergey V Nesterov, Juhani Knuuti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient-tailored risk assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease using Rubidium-82 PET-based myocardial flow quantification with visual interpretation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease usingJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Impact of regadenoson-induced myocardial creep on dynamic Rubidium-82 PET myocardial blood flow quantification.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of remote ischemic conditioning on myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected ischemic coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Protection of coronary circulation: Evaluation by PET perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  15. SPECT but not PET remains as the working horse of the state of the art nuclear cardiac imaging laboratory: Con.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 (Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  19. Effect of Bayesian-penalized likelihood reconstruction on [13N]-NH3 rest perfusion quantification.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antti SarasteTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520 Turku, Finland. antti.saraste@utu.fi
Sami Kajander
Chunlei Han
Sergey V Nesterov
Juhani Knuuti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) enables quantitative measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Recent developments and improved availability of PET technology have resulted in growing interest in translation of quantitative flow analysis from mainly a research tool to routine clinical practice. Quantitative PET measurements of absolute MBF and MFR have potential to improve accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in diagnosis of multivessel coronary artery disease as well as definition of the extent and functional importance of stenoses. This article reviews recent advances and experience in the quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging together with issues that need to be resolved for quantitative analysis to become clinical reality.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationCoronary Artery DiseaseData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRubidium RadioisotopesRubidium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.