Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22733006›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2012

Fine structure of the uteri in two hymenolepidid tapeworm Skrjabinacanthus diplocoronatus and Urocystis prolifer (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) parasitic in shrews that display different fecundity of the strobilae.

Janetta V Korneva, Svetlana A Kornienko, Malcolm K Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2016
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Janetta V KornevaDepartment of Ecological Parasitology, Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS, 152742 Borok, Yaroslavl, Russia. janetta@ibiw.yaroslavl.ru
Svetlana A Kornienko
Malcolm K Jones
Institute of Biology of Inland Waters named Ivan Dmitrievich Papanin · RUInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals · RUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult specimens of Skrjabinacanthus diplocoronatus and Urocystis prolifer were investigated by light and transmission electron microscopy, and data on the uterine organization in these species are presented. The interrelationships of morphological changes of the uterus and developing eggs on the one hand with fecundities of the strobilae of cyclophyllidean cestodes on the other hand are investigated. The development of the excretory system forming a network of excretory ducts close to the uterus is characteristic of S. diplocoronatus. Numerous excretory ducts are located near the uterus or contact the uterine epithelium and are also found in uterine cords. Accumulation of lipids is observed in the cavity of excretory ducts, in muscular cells, and in the lumen of the uterus as well as in the developing eggs. This species displays the largest fecundity among cestode parasites of the shrew. U. prolifer has one of the lowest fecundities among cestodes from shrews. A small amount of lipids found in cells of gravid proglottids could serve as a supply of nutrients. It seems that some cestodes with great fecundity possess specific paths by which eggs are supplied with nutrients. As a result, diverse modifications of the uterus in Cyclophyllidea are formed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCestodaFemaleFertilityMicroscopyOvumShrewsUterus

Identifiers

PMID22733006
OpenAlexW2036939071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.