Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22732902›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2012

Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Claudio Sandroni, Fabio Cavallaro, Cristina Marano, Chiara Falcone, Paolo De Santis, Massimo Antonelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03009669 (The Application of Pleth Variability Index in Continuous Monitoring Volume Status in Patients Undergoing Intestinal Tumor Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03009669 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The Application of Pleth Variability Index in Continuous Monitoring Volume Status in Patients Undergoing Intestinal Tumor Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled50ConditionsHemodynamic Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fluid responsiveness in the pediatric population.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudio SandroniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. sandroni@rm.unicatt.it
Fabio Cavallaro
Cristina Marano
Chiara Falcone
Paolo De Santis
Massimo Antonelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the accuracy of the variation in pulse oxymetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude (∆POP) and the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults.

methodsMEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were screened for clinical studies in which the accuracy of ∆POP/PVI in predicting the hemodynamic response to a subsequent fluid bolus had been investigated. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to summarize the results. Data were stratified according to the amount of fluid bolus (large vs. small) and to the study index (∆POP vs. PVI).

resultsTen studies in 233 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All patients were in normal sinus rhythm. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for identification of fluid responders was 0.85 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.92]. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95 % CI 0.74-0.85) and 0.76 (0.68-0.82), respectively. No heterogeneity was found within studies with the same amount of fluid bolus, nor between studies on ∆POP and those on PVI. The AUC was significantly larger in studies with a large bolus amount than in those with a small bolus [0.92 (95 % CI 0.87-0.96) vs. 0.70 (0.62-0.79); p < 0.0001]. Sensitivity and specificity were also higher in studies with a large bolus [0.84 (95 % CI 0.77-0.90) vs. 0.72 (0.60-0.82) (small bolus), p = 0.08 and 0.86 (95 % CI 0.75-0.93) vs. 0.68 (0.56-0.77) (small bolus), p = 0.02], respectively.

conclusionsBased on our meta-analysis, we conclude that ∆POP and PVI are equally effective for predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated adult patients in sinus rhythm. Prediction is more accurate when a large fluid bolus is administered.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyOximetryPredictive Value of TestsRespiration, ArtificialConfidence IntervalsCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsMonitoring, IntraoperativePlethysmographyPrognosisRisk AssessmentWater-Electrolyte Balance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.