Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22732872›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2012

Focal endoscopic mucosal resection before radiofrequency ablation is equally effective and safe compared with radiofrequency ablation alone for the eradication of Barrett's esophagus with advanced neoplasia.

Hannah P Kim, William J Bulsiewicz, Cary C Cotton, Evan S Dellon, Melissa B Spacek, Xiaoxin Chen, Ryan D Madanick, Sarina Pasricha, Nicholas J Shaheen

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Barrett oesophagus: Is RFA the overall answer to all Barrett oesophagus issues?Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah P KimCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
William J Bulsiewicz
Cary C Cotton
Evan S Dellon
Melissa B Spacek
Xiaoxin Chen
Ryan D Madanick
Sarina Pasricha
Nicholas J Shaheen
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156733 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAJOR, MICHAEL BENJAMIN · 2010 to 2020
$9.7M
DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
Medical Student Scholars Program at UNC NIDDK CentersT32DK062666 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANDLER, ROBERT S. · 2002 to 2006
$262k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156733NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEMR is commonly performed before radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for nodular dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE).

objectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of EMR before RFA for nodular BE with advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia [HGD] or intramucosal carcinoma [IMC]).

designRetrospective study.

settingUniversity of North Carolina Hospitals, from 2006 to 2011. PATIENTS: 169 patients with BE with advanced neoplasia: 65 patients treated with EMR and RFA for nodular disease and 104 patients treated with RFA alone for nonnodular disease.

interventionsEMR, RFA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy (complete eradication of dysplasia, complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, total treatment sessions, RFA treatment sessions), safety (stricture formation, bleeding, and hospitalization).

resultsEMR followed by RFA achieved complete eradication of dysplasia and complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia in 94.0% and 88.0% of patients, respectively, compared with 82.7% and 77.6% of patients, respectively, in the RFA-only group (P = .06 and P = .13, respectively). The complication rates between the 2 groups were similar (7.7% vs 9.6%, P = .79). Strictures occurred in 4.6% of patients in the EMR-before-RFA group. compared with 7.7% of patients in the RFA-only group (P = .53). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study at a tertiary-care referral center.

conclusionIn patients treated with EMR before RFA for nodular BE with HGD or IMC, no differences in efficacy and safety outcomes were observed compared with RFA alone for nonnodular BE with HGD or IMC. EMR followed by RFA is safe and effective for patients with nodular BE and advanced neoplasia.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationEsophagoscopyAgedBarrett EsophagusCombined Modality TherapyEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMucous MembranePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22732872
PMCPMC3909515
OpenAlexW2029565549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.