Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22732833›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2012

Management of occluded metal stents in malignant biliary obstruction: similar outcomes with second metal stents compared to plastic stents.

Tilak Shah, Svetang Desai, Mahfuzul Haque, Hassan Dakik, Deborah Fisher

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade stenting in an occluded biliary self-expandable metal stent.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
  9. Placement of Palliative Stent With Guidance of a Percutaneous Transhepatic Stent.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tilak ShahDivision of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3913, Durham, NC 27710, USA. tilak.shah@duke.edu
Svetang Desai
Mahfuzul Haque
Hassan Dakik
Deborah Fisher
Duke Medical Center · USDurham VA Medical Center · US

Funding

DUKE TRAINING GRANT IN DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND NUTRITIONT32DK007568 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine Garman, Rodger A. Liddle · 1988 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007568NIDDK NIH HHS T32DK007568-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCovered or uncovered self expandable metallic stents (SEMS) placed in patients with malignant biliary obstruction can occlude in 19-40 %, but optimal management is unclear.

aimWe sought to summarize current evidence regarding management of occluded SEMS in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

methodsTwo investigators independently searched Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science using pre-defined search criteria, and reviewed bibliographies of included studies. Data were independently abstracted by two investigators, and analyzed using RevMan. We compared strategies of second SEMS versus plastic stents with respect to the following outcomes: rate of second stent re-occlusion, duration of second stent patency, and survival.

resultsTen retrospective studies met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Management options described were placement of an uncovered SEMS (n = 125), covered SEMS (n = 106), plastic stent (n = 135), percutaneous biliary drain (n = 7), mechanical cleaning (n = 18), or microwave coagulation (n = 7). Relative risk of re-occlusion was not significantly different in patients with second SEMS compared to plastic stents (RR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.92, 1.67, I(2) = 0, p 0.16). Duration of second stent patency was not significantly different between patients who received second SEMS versus plastic stents (weighted mean difference 0.46, 95 % CI -0.30, 1.23, I(2) = 83 %). Survival was not significantly different among patients who received plastic stents versus SEMS (weighted mean difference -1.13, 95 % CI -2.33, 0.07, I(2) 86 %, p = 0.07).

conclusionsAmong patients with malignant biliary obstruction and occluded SEMS, available evidence suggests a strategy of placing a plastic stent may be as effective as second SEMS. Limitations of these findings were that all studies were retrospective and heterogeneity between studies was detected for two of the outcomes.

Indexed as

StentsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholestasis, ExtrahepaticCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsHumansJaundice, ObstructiveMetalsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePlasticsMetalsPlastics

Identifiers

PMID22732833
PMCPMC3920578
OpenAlexW2161686306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.