Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22731941›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2012

Population dynamics and habitat sharing of natural populations of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae.

Marie-Anne Félix, Fabien Duveau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 226 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. FMRFamide-like peptides expand the behavioral repertoire of a densely connected nervous system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Loss of the fatty acid β-oxidation genebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. The Marginal Value Theorem inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AlteredeNeuro · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel infection byInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  12. A gap-free, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Parasite defense covaries with reproductive timing, not with resistance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie-Anne FélixInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS - University of Paris VII, France. felix@biologie.ens.fr
Fabien Duveau

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a major model organism in laboratory biology. Very little is known, however, about its ecology, including where it proliferates. In the past, C. elegans was mainly isolated from human-made compost heaps, where it was overwhelmingly found in the non-feeding dauer diapause stage.

resultsC. elegans and C. briggsae were found in large, proliferating populations in rotting plant material (fruits and stems) in several locations in mainland France. Both species were found to co-occur in samples isolated from a given plant species. Population counts spanned a range from one to more than 10,000 Caenorhabditis individuals on a single fruit or stem. Some populations with an intermediate census size (10 to 1,000) contained no dauer larvae at all, whereas larger populations always included some larvae in the pre-dauer or dauer stages. We report on associated micro-organisms, including pathogens. We systematically sampled a spatio-temporally structured set of rotting apples in an apple orchard in Orsay over four years. C. elegans and C. briggsae were abundantly found every year, but their temporal distributions did not coincide. C. briggsae was found alone in summer, whereas both species co-occurred in early fall and C. elegans was found alone in late fall. Competition experiments in the laboratory at different temperatures show that C. briggsae out-competes C. elegans at high temperatures, whereas C. elegans out-competes C. briggsae at lower temperatures.

conclusionsC. elegans and C. briggsae proliferate in the same rotting vegetal substrates. In contrast to previous surveys of populations in compost heaps, we found fully proliferating populations with no dauer larvae. The temporal sharing of the habitat by the two species coincides with their temperature preference in the laboratory, with C. briggsae populations growing faster than C. elegans at higher temperatures, and vice at lower temperatures.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansDigestive SystemFemaleFoodFranceFruitGeographyHumansLaboratoriesLife Cycle StagesMalePlant StemsPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID22731941
PMCPMC3414772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.