Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22731934›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2012

Generic substitution of lamotrigine among medicaid patients with diverse indications: a cohort-crossover study.

Daniel M Hartung, Luke Middleton, Leanne Svoboda, Jessina C McGregor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Lamotrigine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel M HartungOregon State University College of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. hartungd@ohsu.edu
Luke Middleton
Leanne Svoboda
Jessina C McGregor
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2RR024141 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2006 to 2011
$3.6M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy exists about the safety of substituting generic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Lamotrigine, the prototypical newer AED, is often used for psychiatric and neurological conditions other than epilepsy. The safety of generic substitution of lamotrigine in diverse populations of AED users is unclear.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate potential associations between generic substitution of lamotrigine and adverse consequences in a population of diverse users of this drug. STUDY

designThis study was a retrospective cohort-crossover design using state Medicaid claims data from July 2006 through June 2009.

methodsSubjects were included in the cohort if they converted from brand to generic lamotrigine and had 2 years of lamotrigine use prior to conversion. The frequency of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations and condition-specific ED visits or hospitalizations were recorded in the 60 days immediately following the conversion to generic lamotrigine, then compared with the incidence of the same events during a randomly selected time period indexed to one of the patient's past refills of branded lamotrigine. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to quantify the association between generic conversion and health services utilization while controlling for changes in lamotrigine dose and concurrent drug use.

resultsOf the 616 unique subjects included in this analysis, epilepsy was the most common diagnosis (41%), followed by bipolar disorder (32%), pain (30%) and migraine (18%). Conversion to generic lamotrigine was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of an ED visit (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.97), hospitalization (AOR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.60, 2.50) or condition-specific encounter (AOR 1.75; 95 CI 0.87, 3.51).

conclusionsA statistically significant increase in ED visits, hospitalizations or condition-specific encounters was not observed following the switch from brand to generic lamotrigine, although a type II error cannot be ruled out.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCohort StudiesCross-Over StudiesDrugs, GenericDrug SubstitutionDrug UtilizationEpilepsyHospitalizationHumansLamotrigineMedicaidRetrospective StudiesTriazinesUnited StatesAnticonvulsantsDrugs, GenericLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID22731934
PMCPMC3677951
OpenAlexW2052650998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.