Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22731915›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2012

The worm in the world and the world in the worm.

Mark Blaxter, Dee R Denver

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Structural Analysis of theFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark BlaxterInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK. mark.blaxter@ed.ac.uk
Dee R Denver
Oregon State University · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Mutational and evolutionary impact of mitochondrial dysfunctionR01GM087628 · NIGMS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DENVER, DEE, ESTES, SUZANNE R · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087628Wellcome Trust 095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans is a preeminent model organism, but the natural ecology of this nematode has been elusive. A four-year survey of French orchards published in BMC Biology reveals thriving populations of C. elegans (and Caenorhabditis briggsae) in rotting fruit and plant stems. Rather than being simply a 'soil nematode', C. elegans appears to be a 'plant-rot nematode'. These studies signal a growing interest in the integrated genomics and ecology of these tractable animals.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID22731915
PMCPMC3382423
OpenAlexW1980959680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.